Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donald C & Doris K Byers Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$365k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$365k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$376kReligion$15kArts & Culture$11kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$2kPublic Benefit$1kHealth$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$365,038
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRAKE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL$365,038
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTRE FOR ARTS AND ARTISTS: $7k → 9%DRAKE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL: $365k → 10%BEEFSTICKS FOR BACKPACKS: $1k → 9%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 9%DES MOINES SYMPHONY: $250 → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 9%DES MOINES SYMPHONY: $250 → 10%DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $4k → 9%DES MOINES SYMPHONY: $250 → 10%DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $4k → 9%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 9%DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $3k → 9%CENTRE FOR ARTS AND ARTISTS: $3k → 9%NEWTON YMCA: $1k → 9%NEWTON YMCA: $1k → 9%PROJECT AWAKE: $1k → 9%NEWTON LIONS CLUB: $1k → 9%NEWTON YMCA: $1k → 9%PROJECT AWAKE: $750 → 9%PI FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%SALVATION ARMY: $250 → 9%NEWTON MAIN STREET: $250 → 9%NEWTON MAIN STREET: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 7 repeat orgs$368k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$42k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+76%

Still filing today

71%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24
Arts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTRE FOR ARTS AND ARTISTS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +835%
  • NY
    NEWTON YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +68%
  • NA
    NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +328%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k
  • NL
    NEWTON LIONS CLUB
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1k
  • PF
    PI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    3× · 2020–2022 · $500 · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stone Institute and Newton Home for Aged People
—
2
Newton Public Library Foundation

Support the newton public library

Education
3
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
4
New Art Association
Arts & Culture
5
Pta Iowa Congress

Iowa PTA group for a Newton Iowa Community School

—
6
Newton County Farm Bureau Inc

Agriculture promotion

—
7
The Newton Family Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Newton Housing Development Corporation

Increase the quantity and quality of housing in newton, iowa

Housing & Shelter
9
Seward Arts Council
—
10
New Amsterdam Symphony Orchestra

Advancement of the art of music and public knowledge therefor by producing performances. Featuring emerging conductors and musical soloists.

Arts & Culture
11
Newton Park Inc
Recreation & Sports
12
Newton Development Corporation

The newton development corporation strives to improve the economic well-being of the newton community. we accomplishthis through collaboration with other community stakeholders to increase investment in newton by retaining, growing,and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newton Young Mens Christian Association; the most unlike its peers is Centre for Arts and Artists. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $365,038 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherDOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $11,000 · OtherNEWTON YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · Other+3 more: $2,250 · OtherCENTRE FOR ARTS AND ARTISTS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDES MOINES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $750 · Arts & CultureNewton Main Street: $500 · Arts & CultureNEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $1,750 · EnvironmentPI FOUNDATION: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Education$365,038Other$31,250Arts & Culture$11,250Environment$1,750Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $365,038 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE FOR ARTS AND ARTISTS: $10,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetNEWTON YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $1,750 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDES MOINES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNewton Main Street: $500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPI FOUNDATION: $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE FOR ARTS AND ARTISTS ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Newton Main Street ↗
  • Who funds PI FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fnnb FoundationIA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fnnb Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · The Geisler-Penquite Foundation · Smith Family Foundation Trust · Schiller Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donald C & Doris K Byers Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donald C & Doris K Byers Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald C & Doris K Byers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph