Skip to content

Iowa · Nonprofit

NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC

NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC (Iowa) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $573,527 to it, the largest being THE GEISLER-PENQUITE FOUNDATION ($474,502). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$506k
Funders on record
11
Grants received
$574k
Net assets
$1.5M
8/11 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 72%
01What it does

What Newton Arboretum and Botanical Gardens Inc does

Mission

To develop and maintain an arboretum and botanical garden for the benefit of the public; to increase awareness and appreciation of the environment; to use horticulture as a catalyst for community connection; and to enrich and inspire by growing exhibiting and educating with a foc

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Continue the development of the newton arboretum and botanical garden.

    $117,442 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $117,442.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($69k) Expenses 100 ($71k) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2018 Revenue 39 ($27k) Expenses 159 ($113k) Net assets 92 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 260 ($180k) Expenses 182 ($130k) Net assets 85 ($996k)2020 Revenue 171 ($118k) Expenses 128 ($91k) Net assets 90 ($1.0M)2021 Revenue 77 ($53k) Expenses 115 ($82k) Net assets 96 ($1.1M)2022 Revenue 104 ($72k) Expenses 164 ($117k) Net assets 77 ($900k)2023 Revenue 140 ($97k) Expenses 159 ($113k) Net assets 77 ($895k)2025 Revenue 730 ($506k) Expenses 204 ($146k) Net assets 131 ($1.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'25
Revenue (730)Expenses (204)Net assets (131)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $1.1M to $901k (−19%).

$1.2M
$1.1M
$996k
$1.0M
$1.1M
$901k
$896k
$1.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 55%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$2k
’17
−$86k
’18
$50k
’19
$27k
’20
−$29k
’21
−$45k
’22
−$16k
’23
$360k
’25
6.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'25
Listed1414121211111515
Joined·+0+3+0+9+0+7·
No longer listed·0501003·
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $27k → $31k.

1 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

83%
largest funder
95%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 59% · 2018 78% · 2019 80% · 2020 72% · 2021 82% · 2022 84% · 2023 48% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 73% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC's grant income comes from Iowa funders.

MT
WI
MI
IA
CO
KS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Iowa out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $51k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin71% · top quartile
Months of reserve6.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)28% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Iowa

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 19%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC?
NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC (Iowa) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $573,527 to it, the largest being THE GEISLER-PENQUITE FOUNDATION ($474,502). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC have?
IRS filings report 11 organizations giving $573,527 in grants to NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC?
THE GEISLER-PENQUITE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $474,502 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NEWTON ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Iowa. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Newton Arboretum and Botanical Gardens →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing