Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Donald & Pauline Speich Educ Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$752kRecreation & Sports$36k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $51k
$7,931
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW-MADISON$27,164
UW-RIVER FALLS$12,910
UW-LACROSSE$10,461
COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS$8,957
NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE$7,931
Individual grant recipient$5,953
UNIVERSITY OF MARY IN BISMARCK$4,184
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$4,184
VITERBO UNIVERSITY$2,092
UW EAU-CLAIRE$2,092
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $4k → 11%UW EAU-CLAIRE: $2k → 12%VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UW-MADISON: $27k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MARY IN BISMARCK: $4k → 10%UW-LACROSSE: $10k → 13%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $9k → 13%NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $8k → 13%UW-RIVER FALLS: $13k → 13%WINONA STATE: $6k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MARSHFIELD: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$750k · 31 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
10

Total granted

$750k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+43%

Still filing today

19%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VITERBO UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +7%
  • MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
    4× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +36%
  • ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $14k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN ST PAUL
    one grant, 2024 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
4
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
5
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
6
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
7
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
8
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

9
Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa

We are a Catholic, co-educational, liberal arts university founded in 1843 by the Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Dubuque, Iowa. Clarke educates students at the post-secondary level in the liberal arts and sciences, the…

Education
10
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
11
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
12
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UW-LACROSSE — $104,617 · OtherUW-LACROSSEUW-MADISON — $69,534 · OtherUW-MADISONUW-STEVENS POINT — $55,576 · OtherUW-STEVENS POINTUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $51,728 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS — $38,081 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLSUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE — $35,945 · OtherUW-EAU CLAIRE — $35,818 · OtherCARROLL COLLEGE — $33,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE — $32,218 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON — $30,663 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT — $24,988 · OtherNORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $23,793 · Other+24 more — $161,127 · Other+24 moreVITERBO UNIVERSITY — $27,193 · EducationVITERBO UNIVE…MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $23,816 · EducationMILWAUKEE SCH…ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $13,614 · EducationST NORBERT CO…CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $11,500 · EducationCARROLL UNIVE…Marquette University — $8,404 · EducationMarquette Uni…Trinity International University — $4,764 · Education+1 more — $1,172 · Education
Other$697,588Education$90,463

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY — $27,193 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $23,816 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $13,614 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $8,404 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity International University — $4,764 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $1,172 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLIN COLLEGE INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds Trinity International University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herb Kohl Educational Foundation IncWI22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · The Casper Foundation · Culver's Foundation Inc · Wps Charitable Foundation Inc · Kohler Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Lee Griffin Scholarship Fund · Wisconsin Rural Opportunities Foundation · Holt Family Scholarship Fdn · Frank & Susan Huettner Educ Fd · Montgomery Family Foundation Inc · Cousins Subs Make It Better Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donald & Pauline Speich Educ Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph