Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donald & Patricia Manhard Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$70kHousing & Shelter$59kHuman Services$34kReligion$34kHealth$28kFood & Nutrition$10kInternational$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$961k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$15,000
EVANS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$5,000
MISERICORDIA$5,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$5,000
MERCY HOME$2,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$2,500
BEAR NECESSITIES PEDIATRIC FOUNDATION$2,500
SKOKIE COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,500
GLENCOE POLICE FOUNDATION$1,000
JOHN O'BRIEN FOUNDATION$1,000
ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP$1,000
SAM & MARY PALUMBO FAMILY FOUNDATION$250
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$250
BROADWAY CARES$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 14%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $8k → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $1k → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $930 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 13 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
30

Total granted

$198k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+15%

Still filing today

46%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    3× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • JP
    JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • MH
    MISERICORDIA HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +70%
  • CO
    CHILDREN OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • BN
    Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
4
Daniel Murphy Scholarship Fund

The mission of the daniel murphy scholarship fund is to give high school scholarship assistance and educational support to chicago students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. the fund seeks to make a life-altering difference in…

—
5
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
6
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
7
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
10
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
11
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Group

The elmhurst memorial healthcare group follows the mission of endeavor health (f/k/a ns-ee holdings). the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to…

—
12
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation

To optimize philanthropy in support of the mission and future of the children's hospital of chicago medical center.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sam & Mary Palumbo Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $46,971 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYMISERICORDIA: $28,000 · OtherMISERICORDIACATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $22,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCBEAR NECESSITIES PEDIATRIC FOUNDATION: $13,010 · OtherBEAR NECESSITIES PEDIATRIC FOUNDATIONMERCY HOME: $10,000 · OtherMERCY HOME+25 more: $39,569 · Other+25 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foun…CHILDREN OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT: $5,000 · EducationCHILDREN OUTREACH AND COMMU…EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION+3 more: $748 · EducationMISERICORDIA HOME: $7,500 · Human ServicesJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · Human ServicesElea Institute: $1,930 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $5,000 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO: $200 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $200 · HealthGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $200 · HealthHAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $800 · PhilanthropySAM & MARY PALUMBO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $250 · PhilanthropyGlencoe Public Safety Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$159,550Education$60,748Human Services$13,930Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$5,800Philanthropy$1,050Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $4,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSKOKIE COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetElea Institute: $1,930 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGlencoe Public Safety Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElyssas Mission NFP: $264 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT ↗
  • Who funds Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SKOKIE COUNTRY CLUB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Elea Institute ↗
  • Who funds Glencoe Public Safety Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds Elyssas Mission NFP ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAM & MARY PALUMBO FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dr Scholl FoundationIL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dr Scholl Foundation · Robert & Terri Cohn Family Foundation · Ira and Janina Marks Charitable Trust · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donald & Patricia Manhard Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donald & Patricia Manhard Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald & Patricia Manhard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph