Skip to content

· Private foundation

Don Nierling Mem Fdn Tai Xxxxx6008

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$735k
Granted FY2026still arriving
27
Grants FY2026still arriving
8
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$1.1MHuman Services$771kReligion$507kEducation$459kScience & Tech$457kYouth Development$444kArts & Culture$207kFood & Nutrition$130kOther$0
02FY2026 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k22 grants · $454k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $282k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER$65,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$60,522
JOY BUS$56,200
DESERT MISSION INC$50,000
ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER$50,000
ASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY$40,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$36,313
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$36,313
BILLY'S PLACE$26,500
GRAND CANYON COUNCIL SCOUTING AMERICA$25,400
SUNSHINE RESCUE MISSIONS$25,290
SCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST$25,000
AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC$25,000
CHARRO FOUNDATION$25,000
CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S SCHOOL$24,209
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $576k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC: $25k → 14%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $40k → 19%DESERT MISSION INC: $50k → 11%AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC: $25k → 14%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $40k → 19%DESERT MISSION INC: $45k → 11%AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC: $25k → 14%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $25k → 19%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $20k → 19%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $15k → 19%AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC: $13k → 14%PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $13k → 19%DESERT MISSION INC: $25k → 11%ARIZONANS FOR CHILDREN: $14k → 11%CARING COALITION AZ: $5k → 11%CARING COALITION AZ: $5k → 11%ARIZONANS FOR CHILDREN: $60k → 11%ARIZONANS FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 11%ARIZONANS FOR CHILDREN: $40k → 11%BILLY'S PLACE: $27k → 11%ARIZONANS FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
NY
IA
CA
MD
AZ
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 33 repeat orgs$572k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
16

Total granted

$4.5M
$459k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+3%

Still filing today

76%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2018–2026 · $601k · revenue +94%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2018–2026 · $369k · revenue +26%
  • AS
    ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER
    8× · 2018–2026 · $355k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF JAMESTOWN
    one grant, 2019 · $88k
  • CI
    CHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue +148%
  • PC
    Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
2
The Dons of Arizona
Education
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Flagstaff Medical Center

Improving health, healing people.

Health
5
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
6
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
7
Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum
—
8
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
9
Desert Botanical Garden Inc

The garden's commitment to the community is to advance excellence in education, research, exhibition and conservation of desert plants of the world with emphasis on the sonoran desert. we will ensure that the garden is always a compelling…

Environment
10
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
11
Banner Health

Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".

Health
12
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Desert Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cochise Canine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
20/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $346,560 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCRIPPLED CHILDREN'S SCHOOL: $238,674 · OtherCRIPPLED CHILDREN'S SCHOOLTHE SALVATION ARMY: $119,337 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCANYON STATE ACADEMY INC: $119,337 · OtherCANYON STATE ACADEMY INCST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $119,337 · OtherST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCHDESSERT MISSION INC: $95,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF JAMESTOWN: $87,500 · OtherReigning Grace Ranch: $110,000 · OtherReigning Grace RanchLOWELL OBSERVATORY: $132,000 · OtherLOWELL OBSERVATORY+20 more: $593,727 · Other+20 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $600,503 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHIL…American Heart Association Inc: $369,463 · HealthAmerican Heart Association …MAYO CLINIC: $119,337 · HealthMAYO CLINICMARCH OF DIMES INC: $115,520 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $50,000 · HealthArizonans for Children Inc: $178,600 · Human ServicesArizonans for…PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $152,500 · Human ServicesPAYSON SENIOR…DESERT MISSION INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesDESERT MISSIO…AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC: $88,158 · Human ServicesAGAPE HOUSE O…YAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $32,000 · Human ServicesBILLY'S PLACE INC: $26,500 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER: $355,000 · Arts & CultureARIZONA SCIE…THE HEARD MUSEUM: $121,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HEARD MU…SCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSCOTTSDALE M…BALLET ARIZONA: $48,270 · Arts & CultureBALLET ARIZO…+1 more: $12,500 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $219,337 · Youth DevelopmentASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentREHOBOTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEWARD BOUND: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterINTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $85,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHARRO FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,961,472Health$1,254,823Human Services$607,758Arts & Culture$586,770Youth Development$349,337Housing & Shelter$255,000Philanthropy$160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $600,503 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $369,463 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER: $355,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $219,337 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetArizonans for Children Inc: $178,600 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetPAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC: $152,500 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND: $150,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLOWELL OBSERVATORY: $132,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM: $121,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDESERT MISSION INC: $120,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $119,337 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCANYON STATE ACADEMY INC: $119,337 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $115,520 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetReigning Grace Ranch: $110,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC: $88,158 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $85,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHARRO FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY: $70,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetREHOBOTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $60,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetSCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND CANYON COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBALLET ARIZONA: $48,270 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSunshine Rescue Mission: $45,290 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc: $45,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetUniversity of Jamestown: $40,342 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYAVAPAI CASA FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetACT ONE: $12,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCARING COALITION AZ: $10,000 over 2y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Arizonans for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAYSON SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND ↗
  • Who funds LOWELL OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds THE HEARD MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds DESERT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CANYON STATE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Reigning Grace Ranch ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DARK SKY DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARRO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRING YOUTH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds REHOBOTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE JOY BUS ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BALLET ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds Sunshine Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Jamestown ↗
  • Who funds REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ39.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · Burton Family Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Arizona Diamondbacks Foundationinc · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · American Express Foundation · Otto & Edna Neely Foundation · One Az Community Foundation Inc · Pivotal Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Don Nierling Mem Fdn Tai Xxxxx6008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Don Nierling Mem Fdn Tai Xxxxx6008. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Don Nierling Mem Fdn Tai Xxxxx6008’s filings →

More from the funding graph