Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dominic Sreshta Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$172kEducation$102kReligion$62kHuman Services$33kFood & Nutrition$33kHealth$23kCrime & Legal$15kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
$1,710
Median grant
6
States reached
$896k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BANGALORE JESUIT EDUCATION SOCIETY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
PRATHAM USA$11,000
MAGIC BUS USA$10,700
CHILD ADVOCATES OF FORT BEND$5,114
MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
BAPS CHARITIES$2,501
ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON$2,000
SILVER HEART CARE$1,710
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$1,540
UNICEF$1,367
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$1,030
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$719
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$250
BAPS SHAYONA$234
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Paypal Children Across Borders: $1k → 13%Wounded Warrior Project: $50 → 14%BAPS CHARITIES: $3k → 11%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $3k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 8%BAPS Charities Inc: $3k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 8%Meals on Wheels: $515 → 8%FORT BEND SENIORS MEALS ON WHEELS: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Dominic Sreshta Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 39%.

Dominic Sreshta Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$372k · 30 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
67

Total granted

$372k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+1%

Still filing today

57%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    5× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +20%
  • MB
    MAGIC BUS USA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $46k · revenue +76%
  • CR
    CRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA USA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • P
    PRTHAM
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
6
Water for People

Water for people exists to develop high quality water and sanitation, accessible to all, and sustained by strong communities, businesses, and governments, working in ten countries; guatemala, honduras, tanzania, peru, bolivia, uganda,…

International
7
Unicef Usa Impact Fund for Children Inc

The unicef usa impact fund for children exists to develop and implement financial solutions to ensure every child is healthy, educated, protected, and respected. we believe truly scalable, long-term impact will only be accomplished when we…

Philanthropy
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
Urology Care Foundation Inc

We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.

Health
10
Intelehealth Inc

Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…

International
11
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
12
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baps Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Auroveda Operating Foundation Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
30/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BANGALORE JESUIT EDUCATION SOCIETY: $35,000 · OtherBANGALORE JESUIT EDUCATION SOCIETYPRATHAM: $20,500 · OtherPRATHAMAKSHAYA PATRA USA: $20,000 · OtherAKSHAYA PATRA USAIndividual grant recipient: $19,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $16,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFORT BEND CARES FOUNDATION: $14,413 · OtherFORT BEND CARES FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherPRTHAM: $10,000 · OtherFIDELITY - LEARNING FOR LIFE FONDATION: $10,000 · Other+62 more: $86,888 · Other+62 moreMAGIC BUS USA: $46,400 · InternationalMAGIC BUS USACRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC: $24,527 · InternationalCRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AME…White Dove Foundation: $20,000 · InternationalWhite Dove FoundationUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $19,964 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICE…International Rescue Committee INC: $7,030 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committ…Save The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 · International+3 more: $4,850 · InternationalPRATHAM USA: $59,970 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USAFort Bend ISD Education Foundation: $3,455 · PhilanthropyFort Bend ISD …+2 more: $1,122 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS: $10,515 · Human ServicesBAPS CHARITIES INC: $7,502 · Human ServicesSewa International Inc: $4,001 · Human ServicesCHILDREN ACROSS BORDERS INC: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $300 · Human ServicesiEDUCATE: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $451 · EducationINDIAN AMERICAN CANCER NETWORK IACAN: $7,150 · HealthCOMBAT BLINDNESS INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,185 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,528 · Health+4 more: $325 · HealthFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc: $9,189 · Civil Rights
Other$242,801International$127,771Philanthropy$64,547Human Services$23,318Education$20,451Health$17,688Civil Rights$9,189

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRATHAM USA: $59,970 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAGIC BUS USA: $46,400 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC: $24,527 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWhite Dove Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetiEDUCATE: $20,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $19,964 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFORT BEND CARES FOUNDATION: $14,413 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $10,515 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc: $9,189 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC: $7,502 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN AMERICAN CANCER NETWORK IACAN: $7,150 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $7,030 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $6,114 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMBAT BLINDNESS INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,185 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $4,001 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,740 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFort Bend ISD Education Foundation: $3,455 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE A MOTHER: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY AID COALITION: $2,058 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,528 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless Pet Placement League: $1,080 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINDIA CULTURE CENTER: $1,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN ACROSS BORDERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER: $820 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUROVEDA OPERATING FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST: $500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetThe Reach Project: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and Much Much More: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CALIFORNIANS WITH DISABILITIES: $230 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALVEUS SANCTUARY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLegal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles: $190 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Eola Charter School Foundation Inc: $175 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHaidakhandi Universal Ashram: $146 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGA KHAN FOUNDATION USA: $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE TO THE OTHER MINISTRIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Equine Healing Collaborative Inc: $100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANIMALKIND INC: $98 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $85 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONATE LIFE AMERICA: $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds MAGIC BUS USA ↗
  • Who funds CRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds White Dove Foundation ↗
  • Who funds iEDUCATE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds FORT BEND CARES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN AMERICAN CANCER NETWORK IACAN ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMBAT BLINDNESS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Fort Bend ISD Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A MOTHER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY AID COALITION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX17.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dominic Sreshta Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dominic Sreshta Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dominic Sreshta Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dominic Sreshta Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dominic Sreshta’s filings →

More from the funding graph