Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dolores M Finley Charitable Foundation Trust Agreement

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$240kEducation$197kReligion$77kHealth$75kAnimals$37kHuman Services$18kEmployment$15kRecreation & Sports$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARROW'S NEST$30,000
OUR LADY OF LOURDES SCHOOL$23,000
VALLEY CHRISTIAN CHURCH$12,000
KEITH T ULICH FOUNDATION$10,000
UPTON LAKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ALS ASSN GREATER NY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACTION TOWARDS INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%ACTION TOWARDS INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%ACTION TOWARDS INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
PA
VA
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$617k · 16 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$617k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+39%

Still filing today

31%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterEmploymentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    SPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $240k · revenue +54%
  • AT
    ACTION TOWARD INDEPENDENCE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +76%
  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FP
    FORDHAM PREPARATION SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • CV
    CENTRAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • PD
    PUTNAM DENTAL MISSIONS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
2
Women's Rights Without Frontiers International

Women's rights without frontiers, international ("wrwf- or "the organization") is a nonprofit entity supporting the rights of women and girls, first in china, then in other countries' communities. the organization was founded by regina…

International
3
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
8
Detective Wenjian Liu Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission embodies the character and values of detective wenjian liu, a new york police department detective who was shot and killed in the line of duty in a marked patrol car in december 2014. the foundation strives to…

Animals
9
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
10
Women's World Banking Inc

The mission of women's world banking is to expand the economicassets, participation and power of low-income women and theirhouseholds by helping them access financial services, knowledge andmarkets. for more information, see schedule o.

International
11
Vna Home Health Services

Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…

—
12
Workforce Connections Inc

Wci empowers individuals through employment and training services, helping people of all backgrounds including low-skilled and unskilled adults enter the workforce. we provide economically disadvantaged individuals and those facing…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Central Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPTON LAKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $93,500 · OtherUPTON LAKE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLVALLEY CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $76,500 · OtherVALLEY CHRISTIAN CHURCHIONA PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $66,000 · OtherIONA PREPARATORY SCHOOLKEITH T ULICH FOUNDATION: $48,500 · OtherKEITH T ULICH FOUNDATIONOUR LADY OF LOURDES SCHOOL: $23,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDES SCHOOLMY HOPES IN YOU SMALL ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $15,000 · OtherHOPE ANIMAL RESCUE: $15,000 · Other+16 more: $69,000 · Other+16 moreSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $240,000 · Food & NutritionSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEYACTION TOWARD INDEPENDENCE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · AnimalsTAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE INC: $1,200 · AnimalsCENTRAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUNSHATTERED INC: $5,000 · EmploymentCOWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$406,500Food & Nutrition$240,000Human Services$18,000Animals$5,200Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Employment$5,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $240,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetACTION TOWARD INDEPENDENCE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUNSHATTERED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBYRAM HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ACTION TOWARD INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds UNSHATTERED INC ↗
  • Who funds COWETA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BYRAM HILLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dolores M Finley Charitable Foundation Trust Agreement funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dolores M Finley Charitable Foundation Trust Agreement. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dolores M Finley Charitable Foundation Trust Agreement?

Find your warmest path to Dolores M Finley Charitable Foundation Trust Agreement through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dolores M Finley Charitable Foundation Trust Agreement’s filings →

More from the funding graph