· Private foundation
Dolores J & Robert A Bochatey Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lotus Impact Foundation | $10,000 |
| Cristo Rey St Viator Prep High School | $10,000 |
| Hope Lutheran K-8 School | $9,000 |
| Golden VIEW ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| National Repertory Orchestra - Youth | $5,000 |
| EARTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC LETSDIGORG | $5,000 |
| EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC - COLORADO | $5,000 |
| Project Read - Utah | $5,000 |
| MARKETPLACE OF IDEASMARKETPLACE FOR KIDS | $5,000 |
| JazzSTL | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Ascent Credit Union Foundation | $2,500 |
| Lee's Family Academy | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMIRROR IMAGE2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +14%
- NRNATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +89%
- APA PRECIOUS CHILD INC2× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- HCHILLSDALE COLLEGE K-12one grant, 2022 · $10k
- PPPAWS & PALSone grant, 2023 · $5k
BARD COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +180%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
Within a supportive school community, AAK offers a robust arts program that complements core academics, fosters critical thinking skills, and creates confident, creative individuals with the freedom to reach their full potential.
Missoula international school inspires principled global citizens and lifelong learners through a challenging bilingual education from preschool to eighth grade.
Colorado nbsp;music nbsp;bridge nbsp;provides nbsp;access nbsp;to nbsp;inclusive nbsp;modern nbsp;music nbsp;education nbsp;programs nbsp;curricular nbsp;resources nbsp;and nbsp;professional nbsp;development
The montessori academy of colorado is a metropolitan school that engages each child through innovative academics, exploration of character, and a fearless, forward mindset. mac is dually accredited with the association of colorado…
Ascend College Prep is a public high school for 10-12th grade students in Colorado Springs and the surrounding area. Our Mission is to "Prepare and inspire students to become lifelong learners and responsible citizens through rigorous…
Rocky mountain college educates future leaders through liberal arts and professional programs that cultivate critical thinking, creative expression, ethical decision making, informed citizenship, and professional excellence.
The Agile Learner Fund is a nonprofit organization of Colorado Succeeds. As a supporting organization, ALF exists for the express purpose of supporting activities that benefit Colorado Succeeds' mission, vision, and core strategies. More…
To support college students in innovative, affordable paths to in-demand careers and financial freedom.
Merit School of Music is dedicated to helping young people transform their lives by removing barriers to high-quality music education, with the majority of students benefitting from need-based financial aid, scholarship support, or…
To increase diversity in the legal profession in colorado and to develop tomorrow's diverse leaders in their professional careers. law school yes we can worked with over 300 current mentors, supported over 100 lsywc fellows & connected…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Precious Child Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ascent Credit Union Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARKETPLACE OF IDEASMARKETPLACE FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds MIRROR IMAGE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Learning Connections ↗
- Who funds ALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds PAWS & PALS ↗
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗
- Who funds Ascent Credit Union Foundation ↗
- Who funds ESL IN HOME PROGRAM OF NORTHERN NV ↗
- Who funds THE ANGEL FUND ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds Rockley Family Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dolores J & Robert A Bochatey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.