Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dolly Snyder Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARIQ KHAMISA FOUNDATION$25,000
THE MINISTRY OF HOPE INC$25,000
SUSAN'S KIDS INC$20,000
CALIFORNIA CASA$15,000
STARKEY$10,000
STJUDE CHIDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
ST CHARLES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
YOUTH HORIZONS$5,000
KINGMAN COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSOCIATI$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WICHITA'S LITTLE HEROES$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WICHITA'S LITTLE HEROES: $5k → 16%STARKEY: $10k → 16%SUSAN'S KIDS INC: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
3
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
4
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
6
Extraordinary Home Care Dba St Marys Home Care

A certified home health agency (chha) providing home-based therapy and related rehabilitation services to children and young adults with special needs.

Health
7
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
Kids Home Care Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, and to provide pediatric home health care, alternate site and other pediatric services to pediatric patients. in addition, kids home care conducts health…

Health
9
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
St Joseph's Children's Home Inc

As an agency of social ministry in the catholic tradition, saint joseph's children's home is committed to the whole child, assisting in spiritual, emotional, academic and physical growth. the mission of saint joseph's children's home is to…

Health
11
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
12
Youth Homes

The mission of youth homes is to help every youth feel safe, have a sense of belonging, and find a place to call home.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kingman Community Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Ministry for Hope Inc: $25,000 · OtherThe Ministry for Hope IncST CHARLES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherST CHARLES HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUTH HORIZONS INC: $5,000 · OtherYOUTH HORIZONS INCSUSANS KIDS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSUSANS KIDS INCSTARKEY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSTARKEY INCWICHITAS LITTLEST HEROES: $5,000 · Human ServicesWICHITAS LITTLEST HEROESWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCTARIQ KHAMISA FOUNDATION INC TKF: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTARIQ KHAMISA FOUND…CALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthKINGMAN COMMUNITY THEATRE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$45,000Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$25,000Civil Rights$15,000Health$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Ministry for Hope Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTARIQ KHAMISA FOUNDATION INC TKF: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSUSANS KIDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCALIFORNIA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARKEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CHARLES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKINGMAN COMMUNITY THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITAS LITTLEST HEROES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HORIZONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berry Foundation IncKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dolly Snyder Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dolly Snyder Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dolly Snyder’s filings →

More from the funding graph