Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dodie Anderson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$430k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20222025.

Animals$735kEducation$146kYouth Development$140kHuman Services$63kHealth$40kPhilanthropy$20kOther$149k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $250k+1 grant · $335k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY$335,000
LEAD COLLECTIVE INC$25,000
WAKE UP CAROLINA$25,000
GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MOUNTAIN BRIDGE CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DGBGNQ INC: $45k → 9%BEYOND BASIC LIFE SKILLS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

75%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $735k · revenue +32%
  • LC
    LEAD COLLECTIVE INCCHA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $120k · revenue +671%
  • GT
    GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $101k · revenue -53%

Funded once

  • DI
    DGBGNQ Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
  • UO
    UNIV OF SC GAMECOCK CLUB
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • PH
    PRISMA HEALTH FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gbsc Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
The Carolina Trust
Philanthropy
3
Carolina Core Soccer
Recreation & Sports
4
South Carolina Broadcasters Association Educational Foundation
5
North Carolina Sports Legacy Foundation Fka Promote the Youth Foundation
Philanthropy
6
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
7
Scbio Foundation

By focusing on the mission to enhance the development and growth of south carolina's life sciences industry ecosystem and by strengthening the state's workforce, education, innovation, and research infracstructure, the foundation works to…

Science & Tech
8
Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Education and Research Foundation
Health
9
Greater Augusta Regional Chamber of Commerce Foundation
10
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
11
South Carolina Victim Assistance Network

The south carolina victim assistance network's mission is to ensure crime victims receive access to, and assistance from the criminal and juvenile justice systems and related social service providers; to improve the quality of services…

12
Black Economic Mobility Coalition

Identify and develop talent to increase the number of sustainable Black-owned business in the Upstate

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenville Tech Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dgbgnq Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $735,000 · AnimalsTHE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIM…UNIV OF SC GAMECOCK CLUB — $35,000 · OtherUNIV OF SC GA…MT BRIDGE CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED — $27,000 · OtherMT BRIDGE CHA…LUTHERAN CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOUR — $25,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CHUR…PRISMA HEALTH FAMILY YMCA — $20,000 · OtherPRISMA HEALTH…MOUNTAIN BRIDGE CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED — $15,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN BRID…Individual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual gr…RESTORATION CHAPEL — $10,000 · OtherRESTORATION C…+1 more — $2,000 · OtherGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $101,000 · EducationGREENVILLE T…University of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $45,000 · EducationUniversity o…LEAD COLLECTIVE INCCHA — $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEAD COLLECT…CHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S C…DGBGNQ Inc — $45,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND BASIC LIFE SKILLS — $10,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY — $8,000 · Human ServicesWAKE UP CAROLINA — $35,000 · HealthSHRINE BOWL OF THE CAROLINAS — $5,000 · HealthGARNET TRUST FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$735,000Other$149,000Education$146,000Youth Development$140,000Human Services$63,000Health$40,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $735,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetLEAD COLLECTIVE INCCHA — $120,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $101,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE UP CAROLINA — $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGARNET TRUST FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBEYOND BASIC LIFE SKILLS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY — $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSHRINE BOWL OF THE CAROLINAS — $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jolley FoundationNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dodie Anderson Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dodie Anderson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dodie Anderson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph