Skip to content

· Public charity

Doc Society Inc

We bring people together to unleash the transformational power of independent documentary film.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.5MEducation$178kCommunity Improvement$90kRecreation & Sports$72kHuman Services$48kHealth$24kReligion$20kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $313,075, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,136,661 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $823,586 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$17,575
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MEMORY PROJECT LLC$251,750
PLAN C FOR CIVILIZATION LLC$23,750
CAESURA FILMS$17,575
POINTS NORTH INSTITUTE$10,000
BGDM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SISTER SONG: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
NC
HI
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $819k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$584k · 71% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: FILM PRODUCTION

South Asia$121k · 15% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: FILM PRODUCTION

East Asia and the Pacific$86k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FILM PRODUCTION

North America (Canada and Mexico)$29k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: FILM PRODUCTION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 17 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
35

Total granted

$1.8M
$884k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+14%

Still filing today

29%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $262k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PHILADELPHIA PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $117k · revenue +16%
  • AMISTAD LAW PROJECT
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12k · revenue +52%
  • WN
    Why Not Prosper Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +295%

Funded once

  • GP
    GREENER PASTURES FILM LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $143k
  • OT
    OUR THEORY LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $121k
  • AD
    ASOCIACION DE DOCUMENTALISTAS DE PRgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +46% · 31% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Documentary Inc

A national non-profit media arts organization, american documentary strives to make essential documentaries accessible as a catalyst for public discourse. we collaborate with passionate filmmakers to amplify their voices, nuture the…

Arts & Culture
2
Pittsburgh Filmmakers Inc

The corporation advances excellence in the arts, including studio, media, and creative writing. to achieve its mission, the corporation provides equipment and facilities for individual artists, conducts educational programs, and stimulates…

—
3
Doc Society Inc

We bring people together to unleash the transformational power of independent documentary film. we serve individual filmmakers and the growing network of partners who support them globally. we help build new models, aiming to innovate,…

Philanthropy
4
Docs in Progress Inc

Docs in progress is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization which gives individuals the tools to tell stories through documentary film to educate, inspire, and transform the way people view their world.

Arts & Culture
5
Center for Emerging Media Inc
Arts & Culture
6
Film Pittsburgh

To present independent films from around the world to deepen audiences' understanding of culture, tolerance, and common humanity.

Arts & Culture
7
Women in Media Inc

Women In Media encourages gender balance in film and entertainment industries by providing networking, professional development, and advocacy for above and below the line women and all genders who love making movies with them.

Arts & Culture
8
The Center for Independent Documentary Inc

To produce and distribute socially conscious documentaries.

Arts & Culture
9
Chicago Media Project

To impact society through the powerful tools of media and film. we are a resource for uniting individuals interested in media and developing a core group of informed citizens.

Public Benefit
10
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
11
Public Radio Program Directors Association Inc

Prpd (dba, public media content collective (pmcc)) is a membership organization that empowers public media content leaders, managers, and professionals to understand, serve, and grow their audiences within an increasingly complex and…

—
12
Cousin Collective Inc

COUSIN is a collective supporting Indigenous artists expanding the form of film. We are building an Indigenous-led film movement. We create work that is personal, proudly provocative and driven by strong, artistic voices. We celebrate this…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allied Media Projects Inc; the most unlike its peers is Earth Day Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG SKY FILM PRODUCTIONS INC: $446,500 · OtherBIG SKY FILM PRODUCTIONS INCPLAN C FOR CIVILIZATION LLC: $380,000 · OtherPLAN C FOR CIVILIZATION LLCTHE MEMORY PROJECT LLC: $251,750 · OtherTHE MEMORY PROJECT LLCCURIOUS MATTERS LLC: $214,225 · OtherCURIOUS MATTERS LLCBLUESHIFT MEDIA: $172,500 · OtherBLUESHIFT MEDIAGREENER PASTURES FILM LLC: $142,500 · OtherGREENER PASTURES FILM LLCOUR THEORY LLC: $121,250 · OtherPHILADELPHIA PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION: $116,500 · Other+32 more: $800,961 · Other+32 moreASOCIACION DE DOCUMENTALISTAS DE PR: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCAFA-THIRD HORIZON INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CulturePoints North Institute: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $10,500 · Arts & CultureBROWN GIRLS DOC MAFIA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureEARTH DAY TEXAS INC: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementWhy Not Prosper Inc: $10,500 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,500 · Community ImprovementHEALTH LEADS INC: $23,600 · HealthAMISTAD LAW PROJECT: $11,500 · Crime & LegalTHE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY: $5,500 · EducationSISTERSONG INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$2,646,186Arts & Culture$151,000Recreation & Sports$45,000Community Improvement$41,000Health$23,600Crime & Legal$11,500Education$5,500Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILADELPHIA PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION: $116,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetASOCIACION DE DOCUMENTALISTAS DE PR: $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetEARTH DAY TEXAS INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAFA-THIRD HORIZON INC: $30,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetPACIFIC ISLANDERS IN COMMUNICATIONS: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH LEADS INC: $23,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPoints North Institute: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTORYLINE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAMISTAD LAW PROJECT: $11,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWhy Not Prosper Inc: $10,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSISTERSONG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ASOCIACION DE DOCUMENTALISTAS DE PR ↗
  • Who funds EARTH DAY TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAFA-THIRD HORIZON INC ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN COMMUNICATIONS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH LEADS INC ↗
  • Who funds Points North Institute ↗
  • Who funds STORYLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMISTAD LAW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Why Not Prosper Inc ↗
  • Who funds CULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sundance InstituteUT29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 8 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sundance Institute · The Ford Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · Independence Public Media of Philadelphia Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doc Society Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doc Society Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Doc Society Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Doc Society Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doc Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph