Skip to content
Do Unto Others Trust Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Do Unto Others Trust Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$501kPhilanthropy$121kHealth$90kEducation$80kArts & Culture$68kAnimals$65kYouth Development$20kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$43,227
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITIES$43,227
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERAPHIC FIRE: $3k → 15%MIAMI LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 15%MIAMI LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 15%SERAPHIC FIRE: $11k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$645k · 9 repeat orgs$645k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
30

Total granted

$645k
$645k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+17%

Still filing today

56%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $442k
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITIES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $121k
  • MC
    MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
    2× · 2019–2023 · $24k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2020 · $292k
  • HS
    HUMAN SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI
    one grant, 2023 · $59k
  • MC
    MIAMI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
2
South Florida Symphony Orchestra Inc

The orchestra is dedicated to bringing orchestral music of the highest caliber to south florida. its mission is to delight, inspire and educate the communities we serve through music.

Arts & Culture
3
New World Symphony Inc

Prepares gifted graduates of prestigious music programs for successful careers in orchestras and ensembles.

Education
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
University of Miami
—
7
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
8
Alhambra Music Inc

Community orchestra

Arts & Culture
9
Greater Miami Opera Inc

The mission of greater miami opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera. by expanding its reach to diverse communities throughout miami and fort lauderdale and wider audiences abroad creating a…

Arts & Culture
10
Artis-Naples Inc

Please refer to schedule o for the organization's complete mission statement.

Arts & Culture
11
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida

We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…

—
12
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Grand Opera Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES: $442,346 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESVARIOUS: $292,321 · OtherVARIOUSVARIOUS CHARITIES: $121,351 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIESHUMAN SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI: $58,600 · OtherMIAMI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $50,000 · OtherWELCH COLLEGE: $40,000 · Other+20 more: $107,802 · Other+20 moreNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $25,250 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $22,150 · AnimalsSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $5,150 · AnimalsThe Florida Aquarium Inc: $2,059 · AnimalsMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $23,500 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC: $15,724 · Arts & CultureSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $150 · Arts & CultureWELCH COLLEGE: $40,120 · EducationSERAPHIC FIRE INC: $13,900 · Human ServicesMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC: $11,559 · Human ServicesFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $4,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,600 · Health
Other$1,112,420Animals$54,609Arts & Culture$49,374Education$40,120Human Services$25,459Environment$4,000Health$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELCH COLLEGE: $40,120 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $25,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $23,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC: $15,724 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSERAPHIC FIRE INC: $13,900 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC: $11,559 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $5,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida Aquarium Inc: $2,059 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELCH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds SERAPHIC FIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Florida Aquarium Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitabl…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Do Unto Others Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Do Unto Others Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Seraphic Fire Inc: 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Florida Aquarium Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Do Unto Others’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home