Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Do Unto Others Trust Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$501kPhilanthropy$121kHealth$90kEducation$80kArts & Culture$68kAnimals$65kYouth Development$20kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$43,227
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITIES$43,227
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERAPHIC FIRE: $3k → 15%MIAMI LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 15%MIAMI LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 15%SERAPHIC FIRE: $11k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$645k · 9 repeat orgs$645k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
30

Total granted

$645k
$645k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+17%

Still filing today

56%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $442k
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITIES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $121k
  • MC
    MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
    2× · 2019–2023 · $24k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2020 · $292k
  • HS
    HUMAN SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI
    one grant, 2023 · $59k
  • MC
    MIAMI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
2
South Florida Symphony Orchestra Inc

The orchestra is dedicated to bringing orchestral music of the highest caliber to south florida. its mission is to delight, inspire and educate the communities we serve through music.

Arts & Culture
3
New World Symphony Inc

Prepares gifted graduates of prestigious music programs for successful careers in orchestras and ensembles.

Education
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
University of Miami
7
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

8
Alhambra Music Inc

Community orchestra

Arts & Culture
9
Greater Miami Opera Inc

The mission of greater miami opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera. by expanding its reach to diverse communities throughout miami and fort lauderdale and wider audiences abroad creating a…

Arts & Culture
10
Artis-Naples Inc

Please refer to schedule o for the organization's complete mission statement.

Arts & Culture
11
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida

We are a grassroots organization focused on the critical environmental issues of sw florida. we accomplish this through a myriad of efforts by the teams in our programmatic departments: science, policy, education and wildlife…

12
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Grand Opera Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES — $442,346 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIESVARIOUS — $292,321 · OtherVARIOUSVARIOUS CHARITIES — $121,351 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIESHUMAN SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI — $58,600 · OtherMIAMI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $50,000 · OtherWELCH COLLEGE — $40,000 · Other+20 more — $107,802 · Other+20 moreNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $25,250 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP — $22,150 · AnimalsSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $5,150 · AnimalsThe Florida Aquarium Inc — $2,059 · AnimalsMIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $23,500 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC — $15,724 · Arts & CultureSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $150 · Arts & CultureWELCH COLLEGE — $40,120 · EducationSERAPHIC FIRE INC — $13,900 · Human ServicesMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC — $11,559 · Human ServicesFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $4,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,600 · Health
Other$1,112,420Animals$54,609Arts & Culture$49,374Education$40,120Human Services$25,459Environment$4,000Health$3,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWELCH COLLEGE — $40,120 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $25,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC — $23,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC — $15,724 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSERAPHIC FIRE INC — $13,900 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC — $11,559 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $5,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida Aquarium Inc — $2,059 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELCH COLLEGE
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP
  • Who funds FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC
  • Who funds SERAPHIC FIRE INC
  • Who funds MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds The Florida Aquarium Inc
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Do Unto Others Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc4% of income from government
  • Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc0% of income from government
  • Seraphic Fire Inc0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc0% of income from government
  • The Florida Aquarium Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph