· Private foundation
Del Mar Healthcare Inc
TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE THAT SERVES THE HEALTH, HOUSING AND FINANCIAL SECURITY NEEDS OF THE ELDERLY.
Read this first · the figures below need context
70% of Del Mar Healthcare Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Dayton Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $211k
- $250k+1 grant · $450k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE DAYTON FOUNDATION | $450,000 |
| SAN DIEGO OASIS | $60,000 |
| ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO | $51,311 |
| THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| UNITED CHURCH HOMES | $50,000 |
| GENERATIONS FAMILY FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| DEL MAR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS | $11,000 |
| SERVING SENIORS | $10,000 |
| SOLANA BEACH COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTE | $7,500 |
| SAN DIEGO SENIOR COMMUNITY | $7,500 |
| HOPE WITHOUT BOUDARIES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $313k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDSAN DIEGO OASIS3× · 2022–2025 · $135k · revenue +51%
- EOELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO5× · 2020–2025 · $77k · revenue +31%
- DMDEL MAR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS DMCC4× · 2022–2025 · $26k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- SDSAN DIEGO WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +25%
- CHCOMMUNITY HOUSING WORKSone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -39%
- SMST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Federation brings together representatives of affordable housing community development corporations with others interested in the development and management of housing for low and moderate income persons in San Diego County to mutually…
To increase awareness and action toward issues impacting seniors and to increase philanthropy to senior-focused organizations. together, we can create a future where seniors are no longer vulnerable but vibrant.
To be the leader in providing all-inclusive innovative solutions to the health and social service needs of san diego's elderly.
To increase, preserve and improve quality affordable housing opportunities for working families.
San diego interfaith housing foundation's mission is to sponsor and assist in the development of quality low cost, single and multi-family housing for low income and handicapped persons in the greater san diego metropolitan area.
San diego kind corporation, a ca non profit organization, creates and develops housing and services for the low income elderly and also contributes to other low income senior service and housing projects.
To assist in the development of affordable housing for low income residents of san diego county.
A not-for-profit credit union wholly owned by its members
The salvation army san diego residences inc is a non-profit apartment complex that provides subsidized housing to low income elderly or handicapped persons.
The Interfaith Shelter Network of San Diego (the Organization) is a non-profit, public benefit corporation, incorporated on August 1, 2010 (formerly Ecumenical Council of San Diego County, incorporated April 24, 1970), under the laws of…
To preserve and increase affordable housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents
To assist in the development of affordable housing for low income residents of san diego county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elderhelp of San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Hope Without Boundaries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO OASIS ↗
- Who funds Generations Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHURCH HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds DEL MAR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS DMCC ↗
- Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING WORKS ↗
- Who funds ST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Conrad Prebys Foundation · French Fund Samuel Katherine Tua · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Del Mar Healthcare Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Del Mar Healthcare Inc?
Find your warmest path to Del Mar Healthcare Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.