Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dljh Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$317kHuman Services$135kReligion$85kHealth$36kRecreation & Sports$29kCivil Rights$25kInternational$13kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DEW4 HIM MINISTRIES$7,500
BEMA IMPACT CAMPUS MINISTRIES$5,000
REDEFINED INC$5,000
THE CARYING PLACE INC$5,000
PASTOR RICKS DAILY HOPE$2,500
MARCH FOR LIFE$2,500
WORLD VISION$2,500
NC TENNIS ASSOCIATION$2,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES$2,000
THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE$1,500
MISSION TRIANGLE$1,000
GATEWAY WOMENS CARE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $15k → 8%READ AND FEED: $5k → 8%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $5k → 8%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $5k → 8%READ AND FEED: $200 → 8%THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IN
CA
CO
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$613k · 18 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
16

Total granted

$613k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
-5%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +10%
  • CF
    CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +33%
  • READ AND FEED
    2× · 2019–2021 · $5k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Military Fellowship

Evangelize united states armed forces and disciple christians who are in the military.

Religion
2
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
3
Kay Yow Cancer Foundation Inc

The mission of kay yow cancer fund is to be a part of finding an answer in the fight against all cancers affecting women; through raising money for scientific research, assisting the underserved, and unifying people for a common cause.

Education
4
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
5
Christian Radio International Inc

Provide inspirational programming in various languages domestically and abroad via satellite, cable, internet, radio local am, fm and television mediums.

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
Cair-Foundation Inc

The corporation's mission is to enhance understanding of islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower american muslims and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding through civil rights, government…

Civil Rights
8
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
9
Worklife Ministry Inc

To promote and facilitate the highest quality of work life; providing program resources to benefit the region's residents, workplaces and communities.

Religion
10
247 Media Ministries

The mission of worship 24/7 is to ignite a passion for god through worship that results in a life of generosity, discipleship, evangelism, generosity and service.

Religion
11
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
12
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Knowing God Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/20
Grantees still filing
8/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $316,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $115,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $26,000 · OtherMARCH FOR LIFE: $25,000 · Other+26 more: $69,755 · Other+26 moreAndrew Wommack Ministries Inc: $30,000 · ReligionREVIVE HER MINISTRIES INC: $8,500 · Religion+2 more: $1,500 · ReligionTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $26,500 · Human ServicesREAD AND FEED: $5,200 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $3,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY WOMEN'S CARE: $17,000 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthWORLD VISION INC: $12,500 · InternationalTHE CARYING PLACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$552,255Religion$40,000Human Services$36,700Civil Rights$17,000Health$15,500International$12,500Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE: $26,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGATEWAY WOMEN'S CARE: $17,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREVIVE HER MINISTRIES INC: $8,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetREAD AND FEED: $5,200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CARYING PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCARY VISUAL ART INC: $3,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARY ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE ANGELS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILL YOUR BUCKET LIST FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION TRIANGLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERD'S TABLE SOUP KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY WOMEN'S CARE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds REVIVE HER MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds READ AND FEED ↗
  • Who funds THE CARYING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARY VISUAL ART INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CARY ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUE ANGELS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FILL YOUR BUCKET LIST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA VETERANS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION TRIANGLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S TABLE SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Calvin and Kelly Carter Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Knier Family Foundation · Carolina Hurricanes Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dljh Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dljh Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dljh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph