Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dlh Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$507k
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MEducation$979kInternational$405kHuman Services$315kPhilanthropy$243kFood & Nutrition$66kHealth$61kArts & Culture$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $107k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $280k
$3,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$189,900
EMUNAH OF AMERICA$90,000
MINCHAS ASHER FOUNDATION$37,500
Individual grant recipient$27,000
TORAH UMESORAH$15,000
TOMCHEI TZEDAKA$10,500
MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
JEP CONGREGATIONS OF LI$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA D'MIR$10,000
REFUAH V'SIMCHA$7,800
PRIORITY-1$6,800
RCCS$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,895
MOSDOS BOTOSHAN$5,500
YICBH- YOUNG ISRAEL OF BAL HARBOUR$5,450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BIKUR CHOLIM OF STATEN ISLAND: $3k → 11%TIKVASEINU INC: $5k → 14%TIKVASEINU INC: $5k → 14%RELIEF RESOURCES: $13k → 11%RELIEF RESOURCES: $5k → 11%NASI PROJECT: $100k → 13%NASI PROJECT: $100k → 13%NASI PROJECT: $50k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI: $2k → 6%BELEV ECHAD LEACHDUT: $1k → 11%BELEV ECHAD LEACHDUT: $1k → 11%CHASDEI NOCHUM: $1k → 11%CHASDEI NOCHUM: $1k → 11%YAD CHAYA: $3k → 6%CHASDEI NOCHUM: $1k → 11%BELEV ECHAD LEACHDUT: $1k → 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 6%CHASDEI NOCHUM: $1k → 11%BOBBIE'S PLACE: $1k → 20%BOBBIE'S PLACE: $1k → 20%BOBBIE'S PLACE: $1k → 20%MISASKIM: $5k → 20%TIKVA LEDOROS: $1k → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 81% of Dlh Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 16%.

Dlh Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 84 repeat orgs$592k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
115

Total granted

$3.1M
$531k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+15%

Still filing today

36%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $411k · revenue +93%
  • NP
    NASI PROJECT INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $250k · revenue +72% · 25% of their budget
  • MA
    MINCHAS ASHER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $225k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • CV
    CHAYIM VCHESED RAV BIDERMAN
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -16%
  • SS
    SIMCHA SHLEIMOH KOL SIMON
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
9
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
10
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
12
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/68
Grantees still filing
47/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MYRCB: $389,024 · OtherMYRCBTHE CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE: $217,120 · OtherTHE CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGEIndividual grant recipient: $192,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AHAVAT SHALOM: $130,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AHAVAT SHALOMIndividual grant recipient: $79,000 · OtherTHE LEON MAYER FUND INC: $65,400 · Other+143 more: $854,786 · Other+143 moreSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $411,094 · EducationSHULAMITH SCHOOL…American Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $80,000 · EducationAmerican Friends…Bais Yaakov of Waterbury Inc: $18,000 · Education+5 more: $19,100 · EducationMINCHAS ASHER FOUNDATION: $225,000 · ReligionMINCHAS ASHER …GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $110,260 · ReligionGATEWAYS ORGAN…KEREN HASHVIIS INC: $50,000 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS…SAMCHAINU INC: $16,000 · Religion+10 more: $59,000 · Religion+10 moreEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $211,000 · InternationalEMUNAH OF…FRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL: $45,000 · InternationalFRIENDS O…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $35,000 · InternationalAMERICAN …SHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $17,000 · International+6 more: $11,660 · InternationalNASI PROJECT INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesNASI PROJ…RELIEF RESOURCES INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesRELIEF RE…+10 more: $43,600 · Human Services+10 moreMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureRefua Vesimcha Inc: $16,900 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHEBRON FUND INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF LENEFESH TIDRESHENU INC: $1,800 · Philanthropy
Other$1,928,230Education$528,194Religion$460,260International$319,660Human Services$311,100Arts & Culture$117,900Philanthropy$29,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $411,094 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNASI PROJECT INC: $250,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetMINCHAS ASHER FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $211,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $110,260 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $80,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LEON MAYER FUND INC: $65,400 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL: $45,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $43,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBais Yaakov of Waterbury Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRefua Vesimcha Inc: $16,900 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $14,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBeis Midrash of Queens: $13,223 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEANINGFUL MINUTE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIKVASEINU INC: $10,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEP CONGREGATION OF LONG ISLAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHATZALAH OF THE ROCKAWAYS & NASSAU COUNTY INC: $7,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH LITERACY FOUNDATION INC: $6,800 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIVOT HORAAH: $5,400 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCongregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Yedidim Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $4,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES WAY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHASDEI NOCHUM INC: $4,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOBBIES PLACE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBelev Echad Leachdut Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $2,840 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBikur Cholim of Staten Island Inc: $2,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAD CHAYA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERCAZ HATORAH OF WHITE OAK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetANIYEI YERUSHALAYIM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH FIVE 613 INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER YEHUDI: $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLEV SHALOM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds NASI PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MINCHAS ASHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Ramot Torah Schools ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LEON MAYER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov of Waterbury Inc ↗
  • Who funds RELIEF RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Refua Vesimcha Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMCHAINU INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY59.5× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The J W Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Fjc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Donors Fund Inc · The Setton Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dlh Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dlh Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Bais Yaakov of Waterbury Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dlh Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dlh Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 212 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dlh’s filings →

More from the funding graph