Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dj and Nb Larson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Environment$31kHealth$22kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$8kRecreation & Sports$8kFood & Nutrition$5kAnimals$3kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$893k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$14,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO SANTA CRUZ$7,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION MONTEREY COUNTY$6,000
GREY BEARS$5,000
LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ$5,000
HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY$2,500
ELKHORN SLOUGH FOUNDATION$2,000
TEEN KITCHEN PROJECT$2,000
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$2,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GREY BEARS: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 7 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$44k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+39%

Still filing today

71%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsCivil RightsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • CW
    COASTAL WATERSHED COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +27%
  • TK
    TEEN KITCHEN PROJECT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • LT
    LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +319%
  • UT
    Upwell Turtlesgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +39%
  • PD
    POSITIVE DISCIPLINE COMMUNITY RESOURCES
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
2
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
3
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

4
Friends of Santa Cruz State Parks

Friends of santa cruz state parks is a vital partner to california state parks, creatively working to ensure parks and beaches throughout santa cruz county and coastal san mateo county are thriving and available to all.

5
Santa Cruz Community Farmers Market

To serve our community by providing direct access to sustainable sources of fresh produce and other unique foods, and provide education about food issues, both local and beyond.

6
Santa Cruz Mountains Trail Stewardship

Santa Cruz Mountains Trail Stewardship is creating and maintaining world-class trails responsibly, sustainably, and collectively.

Environment
7
Big Sur Land Trust

The mission of the Big Sur Land Trust is to inspire love of the land and conservation of our treasured landscapes.

Environment
8
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
9
Ecology Action of Santa Cruz

The primary and specific purpose for which the said corporation is formed is to empower individuals, businesses and communities to take actions today that achieve environmental and economic sustainability. The activities of the corporation…

Environment
10
The Land Trust for Santa Barbara County

To conserve natural resources, agricultural land and open spaces for present and future generations.

Environment
11
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
12
Sequoia Riverlands Trust

We conserve the lands and waters of California's heartland.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Land Trust of Santa Cruz County and the most unlike its peers is Positive Discipline Community Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ — $8,000 · OtherLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $7,750 · OtherHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTYCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIO SANTA CRUZ — $7,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIO SANTA CRUZST JUDE HOSPITAL — $7,000 · OtherST JUDE HOSPITALMOUNTAIN PARKS FOUNDATION OF SANTA CRUZ — $3,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN PARKS FOUNDATION OF SANTA CRUZPLANNED PARENTHOOD DEL MONTE — $2,000 · OtherCOASTAL WATERSHED COUNCIL — $5,500 · EnvironmentCOASTAL WATERSH…LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $5,000 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST OF S…PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $2,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN …SANTA CRUZ HUB FOR SUSTAINABLE LIVING — $1,000 · EnvironmentSANTA CRUZ HUB …COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $6,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOU…Elkhorn Slough Foundation — $6,000 · PhilanthropyElkhorn Sloug…GREY BEARS — $5,000 · Human ServicesGREY BEAR…POSITIVE DISCIPLINE COMMUNITY RESOURCES — $3,000 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE …TEEN KITCHEN PROJECT — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $5,000 · HealthUpwell Turtles — $3,000 · AnimalsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $3,000 · Civil Rights
Other$49,250Environment$13,500Philanthropy$12,000Human Services$8,000Youth Development$5,000Health$5,000Animals$3,000Civil Rights$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $7,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetElkhorn Slough Foundation — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL WATERSHED COUNCIL — $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTEEN KITCHEN PROJECT — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREY BEARS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUpwell Turtles — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOSITIVE DISCIPLINE COMMUNITY RESOURCES — $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARKS FOUNDATION OF SANTA CRUZ — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CRUZ HUB FOR SUSTAINABLE LIVING — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Santa Cruz CountyCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Volunteer Centers of Santa Cruz County · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sharanam Foundation · Helen and Will Webster Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dj and Nb Larson Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph