Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dismas House of St Louis

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$222kHealth$94kAnimals$93kRecreation & Sports$81kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kHousing & Shelter$46kEducation$31kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$880
Median grant
3
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PETER AND PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$11,160
ST LOUIS POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE$9,180
Individual grant recipient$5,850
Individual grant recipient$5,500
FATHERS FAMILIES$4,250
SOUL FISHER MINISTRY$1,750
CRIME VICTIMS CENTER$1,669
NORTH PATROL POLICE & BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP$1,600
FARMINGTON REGIONAL CHAMBER$1,525
ST FRANCOIS COUNTY ROTARY CLUB$1,450
MADISON COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$900
KIWANIS OF FARMING$880
LINDELL CLUB$840
CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS$818
Individual grant recipient$656
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BRENDEN'S FRIDAY BACKPACKS: $5k → 9%Brenden's Friday Backpacks: $2k → 9%GATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $15k → 21%FATHERS AND FAMILIES SUPPORT CENTER: $3k → 21%FATHERS AND FAMILIES SUPPORT CENTER: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$413k · 18 repeat orgs$348k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
42

Total granted

$413k
$323k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $57k · revenue +13%
  • PP
    PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +162%
  • CT
    CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • EW
    ERISE WILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $57k · revenue +27%
  • SO
    Shrine of St Joseph
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • SM
    ST MARTINS WILLING WORKERS MINISTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis County Police Welfare Assoc

Assistance to police officers and their families.

Human Services
2
Forward Through Ferguson

Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…

Civil Rights
3
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
4
St Louis Survivors' Legal Support Inc

SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.

Crime & Legal
5
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
6
Behavioral Health Network of Greater St

Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.

Health
7
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
8
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
9
Advocates for Family Peace

To improve lives by ending domestic violence.

Human Services
10
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
11
St Louis Police Leadership Organization

Provide social and fraternal activities and represent the interests of the supervisors and commanders of the st louis metropolitan police department.

—
12
New Orleans Police and Justice Foundation Inc

Support of the new orleans police department and orleans parish criminal justice system along with crime prevention activities with the public. nopjf helps the nopd initiate innovative programs that make new orleans a safer place to live,…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections to Success; the most unlike its peers is North Patrol Police & Business Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $92,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientShrine of St Joseph: $30,000 · OtherShrine of St JosephWEST SPRINGS CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherWEST SPRINGS CHURCHOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN: $30,000 · OtherOUR SAVIOR LUTHERANST MARTINS WILLING WORKERS MINISTRY: $25,776 · OtherTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $19,685 · Other+59 more: $271,101 · Other+59 moreST LOUIS POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $56,711 · Youth DevelopmentST LOUIS …JEFFERSON COUNTY FOSTER CHILDRENS FUND: $6,777 · Youth DevelopmentJEFFERSON…ERISE WILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC: $57,003 · Health+2 more: $2,222 · HealthAGAPE TIME MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $50,000 · ReligionPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $41,992 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $170 · Housing & ShelterGATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesBRENDENS FRIDAY BACK PACK PROGRAM: $6,777 · Human ServicesFATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $4,889 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS: $20,603 · Employment
Other$499,062Youth Development$63,488Health$59,225Religion$50,000Housing & Shelter$42,162Human Services$26,666Employment$20,603

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetERISE WILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC: $57,003 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetST LOUIS POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $56,711 over 5y, 18% of budgetAGAPE TIME MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetPETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $41,992 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS: $20,603 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $19,685 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF FRANCIS PARK: $15,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetAlmost Home: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH PATROL POLICE & BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP: $9,786 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $7,701 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRENDENS FRIDAY BACK PACK PROGRAM: $6,777 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Louis Police Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $4,889 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOULFISHER MINISTRIES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget4522 CLUB: $1,222 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlive Inc: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARED BLESSINGS INC: $170 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ERISE WILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE TIME MINISTRIES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FRANCIS PARK ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PATROL POLICE & BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BRENDENS FRIDAY BACK PACK PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY FOSTER CHILDRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds St Louis Police Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO24.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Regional Business Council · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Tsf · World Wide Technology Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Dennis M Jones Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dismas House of St Louis funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dismas House of St Louis. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dismas House of St Louis?

    Find your warmest path to Dismas House of St Louis through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dismas House of St Louis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph