Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Disanto Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$734k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$224k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Education$634kHealth$89kRecreation & Sports$72kPublic Safety & Disaster$51kReligion$45kArts & Culture$36kYouth Development$28kHuman Services$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $542k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV$224,100
MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL$110,575
Individual grant recipient$102,500
ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL$54,664
Individual grant recipient$50,000
BENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS$25,000
FIRST TEE CLEVELAND$25,000
EVANS SCHOLARSHIP FDN$15,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FILM COMMISSION$10,000
ONE PERCENTAGE FL ATHLETIC INC$10,000
EDGE TACTICAL FOUNDATION$5,000
CH OF THE GESU$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%VETERANS & FIRST RESPONDERS INC: $30k → 9%VETERANS & FIRST RESPONDERS INC: $20k → 9%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $10k → 17%ORANGE EFFECT FDN: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$780k · 19 repeat orgs$404k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$780k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

47%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $282k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $234k · revenue +13%
  • TV
    THE VETERANS AND FIRST RESPONDERS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS COMMISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +17%
  • CO
    CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Cleveland Foundation

Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.

Philanthropy
2
Sports Event Development Fund

The sports event development fund supports the greater cleveland sports commission and its mission to measurably improve the economy of greater cleveland and enrich the community by attracting, creating, managing and enhancing significant…

Community Improvement
3
Cleveland Leadership Center

The mission of cleveland leadership center (the organization) is to build a continuum of civic leaders committed to our community's excellence by serving as a catalyst for civic engagement. the organization achieves its mission by…

Education
4
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
5
Cleveland Development Foundation

Developing and improving Cleveland Ohio's civic visions.

Community Improvement
6
Greater Cleveland Partnership

Business association mobilizing private, civic, and public leadership, expertise, and resources to accelerate growth and prosperity across the region.

Community Improvement
7
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
8
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
9
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
10
Cleveland Arts Prize

The cleveland arts prize identifies, rewards, publicly honors and promotes those creative artists whose original work and accomplishments have set a standard of excellence to which other artists can aspire. additionally, the cleveland arts…

Arts & Culture
11
Greater Cincinnati Convention and Visitors Bureau Inc

The cincinnati usa convention & visitors bureau is an aggressive sales, marketing, and service organization. our primary responsibility is to positively impact the region's area economy through convention, tradeshow and visitor…

12
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Rowing Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Veterans and First Responders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMember Sports & Social ClubsCommunity Foundation FundsJewish Federation Cleveland…Professional & Community Ad…Cleveland Regional Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr16%16%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr19%12%35–55yr19%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr16%3%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr19%3%35–55yr19%80%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
1,299/9,791

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL — $161,075 · OtherMAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $102,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $95,000 · OtherBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATEDST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND — $68,664 · OtherST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELANDIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherJESUIT RETREAT CENTER — $30,000 · OtherWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Other+33 more — $142,470 · Other+33 moreCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $234,100 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UN…EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATI…THE VETERANS AND FIRST RESPONDERS — $50,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesGREATER CLEVELAND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $30,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FIRST TEE OF CLEVELAND — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSHAKER YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCanterbury Heritage Foundation Co — $13,000 · Arts & CultureThe Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage — $5,000 · Arts & CultureLIFEACT — $15,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · Health
Other$759,709Education$249,100Human Services$60,500Philanthropy$55,000Recreation & Sports$26,000Arts & Culture$18,000Health$15,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $234,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VETERANS AND FIRST RESPONDERS — $50,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF CLEVELAND — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIFEACT — $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanterbury Heritage Foundation Co — $13,000 over 3y, 55% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS COMMISSION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND ROWING FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLAKE ERIE FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLITTLE ITALY REDEVELOPMENT CORP — $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGates Mills Land Conservancy — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHAKER YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND POLICE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGATES MILLS HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ORANGE EFFECT FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVISTA MARIA — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE VETERANS AND FIRST RESPONDERS
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF CLEVELAND
  • Who funds LIFEACT
  • Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Canterbury Heritage Foundation Co
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS COMMISSION
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds The Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage
  • Who funds CLEVELAND ROWING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LITTLE ITALY REDEVELOPMENT CORP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · The Fedeli Family Charitable Foundation · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · The Veale Foundation · The Howley Foundation · Lincoln Electric Fdn Pfdn · John P Murphy Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland · Dewine Family Foundation Inc · The Covia Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Disanto Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph