Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dirienzo Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$119kEducation$49kReligion$38kSocial Science$21kPublic Benefit$18kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$11kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SOUTH RENO BAPTIST CHURCH$8,000
NEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE$7,000
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$5,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$5,000
THE HAYEK GROUP$2,600
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$2,000
NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION$2,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$1,000
TURNING POINT USA$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
RENO SPARKS GOSPEL MISSION$1,000
AMERICAN LEGION CHARITIES$1,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIA SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Domestic Violence Resource Center: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
NV
WY
SD
IN
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$194k · 17 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$194k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+40%

Still filing today

47%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPublic BenefitHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $11k · revenue +80%
  • HG
    HAYEK GROUP
    2× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue +142%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
4
Nuclear Matters

Inform the public and policymakers about the clear benefits of nuclear energy and support policy solutions that properly value nuclear energy as a reliable, affordable, safe and clean energy source.

Science & Tech
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
9
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
10
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $54,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTH RENO BAPTIST CHURCH: $26,500 · OtherSOUTH RENO BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $21,000 · OtherNEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherTHE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+19 more: $41,500 · Other+19 moreHAYEK GROUP: $8,100 · EducationNorthern Nevada Math Club Inc: $5,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $8,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $6,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Public BenefitNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $1,000 · PhilanthropyARTOWN: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · HealthDOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $1,500 · Human Services
Other$241,000Education$20,100Public Benefit$17,000Philanthropy$6,000Arts & Culture$5,000Health$4,000Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $21,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $10,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHAYEK GROUP: $8,100 over 2y, 13% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Nevada Math Club Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARTOWN: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern Nevada: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEVADA POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HAYEK GROUP ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Northern Nevada Math Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTOWN ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Northern Nevada ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Deborah and Tj Day Foundation · Helen Close Charitable Foundation · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Renown Health · Willametta K Day Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dirienzo Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dirienzo Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dirienzo’s filings →

More from the funding graph