Skip to content

Colorado · Public charity

Directors' Invitational Ski Classic

The purpose of the corporation is to foster national or international amateur sport competition and education. To further such purpose the corporation shall promote ski education and training and shall hold competitive ski meets. The proceeds of donations and registration fees are donated to various ski-related charitable organizations.

$90k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
67%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$56k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$37,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$276k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations Directors' Invitational Ski Classic funded were first-time grantees, receiving 79% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$48k0%
FY20246$194k67%
FY20232$65k50%
FY20221$140k100%
FY20202$88k50%
FY20193$95k67%
FY20181$80k0%
FY20171$40kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$731kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
United States Ski Team Foundation$310,00051%
United States Ski Association$161,50020%
American Downhiller$158,0002n/a
World Cup Dreams Foundation Fka Sfi Foundation$38,32924%
T2 Foundation$20,00016%
Telluride Ski and Snowboard Club Inc$17,50021%
Bob Beattie Ski Foundation$15,000110%
Stiegler Ski Racing Camps LLC$13,0001n/a
Lake Tahoe Ski Club Foundation$8,000115%
Z Girls Foundation$8,00011%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Directors' Invitational Ski Classic supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $310,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUnited States Ski Association: $161,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Cup Dreams Foundation Fka Sfi Foundation: $38,329 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetT2 Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTelluride Ski and Snowboard Club Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBob Beattie Ski Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetLake Tahoe Ski Club Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetZ Girls Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Directors' Invitational Ski Classic with peer funders

About Directors' Invitational Ski Classic

How much does Directors' Invitational Ski Classic give?
Directors' Invitational Ski Classic reported 3 itemized grants totaling $55,819, out of $89,819 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Directors' Invitational Ski Classic fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (97%), Education (2%), Philanthropy (1%).
Who are Directors' Invitational Ski Classic's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: United States Ski Team Foundation ($310k), United States Ski Association ($162k), American Downhiller ($158k).
Does Directors' Invitational Ski Classic fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Directors' Invitational Ski Classic?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Directors' Invitational Ski Classic based?
Directors' Invitational Ski Classic is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Directors' Invitational Ski Classic’s filings →

More from the funding graph