Skip to content
Dinim Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Dinim Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MHuman Services$364kPhilanthropy$324kEducation$76kArts & Culture$55kHealth$7kInternational$5kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k46 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $118k
$252
Median grant
6
States reached
$237k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEOHR BAIS YAAKOV$48,000
Individual grant recipient$44,500
CONG BAIS SHOLOM$13,680
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$8,254
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERES BNOS YERUSHALAYIM$6,000
HALACHICALLY SPEAKING$6,000
LONG ISLAND TORAH NETWORK$4,000
EMET OUTREACH$3,600
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES$3,007
YESHIVA ADERES HATORAH (RABBI SENTER)$2,480
Individual grant recipient$2,376
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CONGREGATION AHAVAS SHALOM$1,828
Individual grant recipient$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANI LEDODI: $500 → 6%HAKSHIVA: $100 → 17%HAKSHIVA: $100 → 17%ISRAEL MOGEN FUND: $25k → 10%HAKSHIVA: $72 → 17%ISRAEL MAGEN FUND: $25k → 10%ISRAEL MAGEN FUND: $10k → 10%HAKSHIVA: $37 → 17%HAKSHIVA: $18 → 17%KOLLEL AMERICA OF SK INC: $100 → 11%CHAI 4EVER: $100 → 11%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $10k → 20%HACHESHBONE THE BUDGET INC: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY LEGACY FUND: $1k → 14%HACHESHBONE THE BUDGET INC: $180 → 14%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $204 → 20%MISASKIM: $180 → 20%BONEH OLOM: $54 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $54 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $50 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
MD
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 70 repeat orgs$891k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
178

Total granted

$1.5M
$841k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+5%

Still filing today

17%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    Israel Magen Fund Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $60k · revenue +75%
  • YI
    YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $44k · revenue +74%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF BARBADOS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $14k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $209k
  • OD
    OR DAVID OUTREACH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH TEFILLAH
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
6
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
10
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shavei Hevron Institutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 272 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/58
Grantees still filing
32/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOSDOS ZOS LYAAKOV INC: $245,200 · OtherMOSDOS ZOS LYAAKOV INCIndividual grant recipient: $209,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $168,590 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEOHR BAIS YAAKOV: $139,110 · OtherMEOHR BAIS YAAKOVOR DAVID OUTREACH: $100,000 · OtherOR DAVID OUTREACHIndividual grant recipient: $65,629 · Other+163 more: $873,070 · Other+163 moreTHE KATAN FOUNDATION INC: $312,560 · PhilanthropyTHE KATAN FOUND…+3 more: $2,929 · PhilanthropyYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $44,260 · ReligionCHAYIM V CHESED: $42,600 · ReligionCHABAD OF BARBADOS INC: $13,630 · ReligionLong Island Torah Network: $12,000 · Religion+2 more: $4,500 · ReligionIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesHACHESHBONE THE BUDGET INC: $10,180 · Human ServicesMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $10,000 · Human Services+6 more: $2,829 · Human ServicesMosdos Yaakov Vyisroel: $15,530 · EducationTHE DESTINY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERES BNOS YERUSHAL: $6,000 · EducationEMET OUTREACH: $3,600 · Education+3 more: $931 · EducationVanderbilt University Medical Center: $3,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,288 · HealthCentral Fund of Israel: $1,830 · InternationalSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL: $110 · International
Other$1,800,599Philanthropy$315,489Religion$116,990Human Services$83,009Education$36,061Health$4,288International$2,440

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE KATAN FOUNDATION INC: $312,560 over 2y, 66% of budgetIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetYESHIVA IMREI BINA INC: $44,260 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $42,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMosdos Yaakov Vyisroel: $15,530 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHABAD OF BARBADOS INC: $13,630 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLong Island Torah Network: $12,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetHACHESHBONE THE BUDGET INC: $10,180 over 2y, 14% of budgetMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE DESTINY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNETZACH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERES BNOS YERUSHAL: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEMET OUTREACH: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKOLLEL OZ INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,830 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,288 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReb Shayalas Kitchen: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $571 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAni Ledodi Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $389 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $362 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TIFERES BORUCH: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAKSHIVA INC: $327 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC: $311 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMDEINI INC: $280 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $216 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS IN C: $180 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH BEND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAALEH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $118 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MISHTERET YISRAEL: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE KATAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Israel Magen Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA IMREI BINA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED ↗
  • Who funds Mosdos Yaakov Vyisroel ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF BARBADOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Long Island Torah Network ↗
  • Who funds HACHESHBONE THE BUDGET INC ↗
  • Who funds KIRYAT TELZ-STONE INC ↗
  • Who funds MY EXTENDED FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DESTINY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…Zichron Chaim Charity…The Jmg FoundationAssociated Jewish Cha…Eisenberg Family Foun…Kitov FoundationThe Fishoff Family Fo…The Sorala FoundationHouse of Gross Founda…Yisroel Aryeh and Lei…
The Ojc FundNY64.8× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Kitov Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · House of Gross Foundation Inc · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dinim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dinim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Tiferes Boruch: 2% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dinim Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dinim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 272 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dinim’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home