Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dinesh and Kalpana Patel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$273k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$334kReligion$322kEducation$309kArts & Culture$230kScience & Tech$118kYouth Development$61kPublic Benefit$53kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$756k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Utah$75,000
BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha$35,001
NEDMED$33,000
Sri Ganesha Hindu Temple$15,002
Ekal Vidyalaya$11,250
Utah SymphonyUtah Opera$10,000
Utah Presents$10,000
Salt Lake Chamber Foundation$10,000
US Olympic and Paralympic Assoc$6,250
Shri Shri Krishna Temple$6,002
Gujarati Cultural Association of Utah$6,000
League of American Orchestras$5,000
Hindu American Foundation$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Utah Teluga Association$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wounded Warrior Project: $25 → 14%Canine Companions for Independence: $250 → 5%BAPS CHARITIES: $3k → 8%BAPS CHARITIES: $1k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $250 → 8%The Road Home: $250 → 8%The Road Home: $500 → 8%The Road Home: $300 → 8%The Road Home: $300 → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $250 → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $250 → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $250 → 8%Utah Youth Village: $12k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $10k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $10k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $10k → 8%Utah Youth Village: $10k → 8%Utah Youth Village: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 65 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

65 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
67

Total granted

$1.5M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+23%

Still filing today

38%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthInternationalEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $124k · revenue +49%
  • UY
    UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $54k · revenue +4%
  • US
    UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA
    6× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UO
    U of Michigan College of Pharmacy
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • CS
    CROCKER SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
3
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
5
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
6
Utah Chamber Artists

The Utah Chamber Artists (UCA) is a world renowned, not-for-profit organization founded in 1991 to provide audiences with an artistic force that provides a wide variety of music of the highest caliber, presented in the finest manner. UCA…

Arts & Culture
7
Utah Library Association

The mission of the Utah Library Association is to serve the professional development and educational needs of its members and to provide leadership and direction in developing and improving library and information services in the state. In…

—
8
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
9
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
10
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
11
Utah Education Fits All

To ensure utah families have the freedom and access to choose the best fit for their childs education.

Education
12
Utah Arts Alliance

To foster the arts in all forms in order to create an aware, empowered, and connected community.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salt Lake Chamber Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/45
Grantees still filing
28/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $207,179 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHNEDMED: $165,000 · OtherNEDMEDSRI GANESHA HINDU TEMPLE: $154,544 · OtherSRI GANESHA HINDU TEMPLEU of Michigan College of Pharmacy: $100,000 · OtherU of Michigan College of PharmacyBAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha: $73,697 · OtherBAPS Swaminarayan SansthaKRISHNA TEMPLE CORPORATION: $57,556 · OtherHUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTE: $45,600 · OtherShakti Krupa Charitable Trust: $44,500 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $41,000 · Other+106 more: $320,598 · Other+106 moreThe Leonardo: $162,620 · Arts & CultureThe LeonardoTHE ORRIN G HATCH FOUNDATION: $54,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ORRIN G HATCH FO…UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $38,500 · Arts & CultureUTAH SYMPHONY & OPER…THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureTHE SALT LAKE TRIBUN…HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $14,505 · Arts & CultureGUJARTI CULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $11,815 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $123,500 · HealthMaliheh Free Clinic: $6,500 · Health+2 more: $4,250 · HealthUTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $54,000 · Human ServicesBAPS CHARITIES INC: $3,501 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME: $2,350 · Human Services+2 more: $275 · Human ServicesZAMBIAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $14,760 · EducationJOSEPH JAMES MORELLI LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationIndia Cultural Center of Utah: $9,849 · PhilanthropyUTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropySalt Lake Chamber Foundation: $10,000 · EmploymentSAFFRON KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · Employment
Other$1,209,674Arts & Culture$329,440Health$134,250Human Services$60,126Education$21,260Philanthropy$17,349Employment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Leonardo: $162,620 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $123,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ORRIN G HATCH FOUNDATION: $54,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $54,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $38,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZAMBIAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $14,760 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $14,505 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGUJARTI CULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $11,815 over 8y, 92% of budgetSalt Lake Chamber Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIndia Cultural Center of Utah: $9,849 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetUTAH ASIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 6y, 56% of budgetUTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $6,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRISE UP SCHOOL OF DANCE: $6,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJOSEPH JAMES MORELLI LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUtah Cultural Alliance Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBioUtah: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $4,380 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $2,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetULHAAS BENGALI ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH TAMIL SANGAM: $2,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSHIRDI SAI MANDIR OF UTAH: $1,153 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGARY & JEANETTE HERBERT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLATINOS IN ACTION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Visitors Utah Council: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Leonardo ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ORRIN G HATCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds ZAMBIAS SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GUJARTI CULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Salt Lake Chamber Foundation ↗
  • Who funds India Cultural Center of Utah ↗
  • Who funds UTAH ASIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH TIBETAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds RISE UP SCHOOL OF DANCE ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH JAMES MORELLI LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT29.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Semnani Family Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · The Diane and Sam Stewart Family Foundation · John and Marcia Price Family Foundation · Ballard Miller Foundation · Salt Lake Arts Council Foundation · The Huntsman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dinesh and Kalpana Patel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dinesh and Kalpana Patel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dinesh and Kalpana Patel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dinesh and Kalpana Patel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dinesh and Kalpana Patel’s filings →

More from the funding graph