· Private foundation
Dillingham Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $211k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOLDIER'S WISH FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| WARRIORS FOR FREEDOM FOUNDATION | $78,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF ENID & NORTHWEST OKLAHOMA | $53,000 |
| BENNIE'S BARN | $20,000 |
| OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA | $10,000 |
| POKES WITH A PURPOSE | $5,000 |
| OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| OKLAHOMA BETA OF PI BETA PHI | $5,000 |
| CIMARRON COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $1,500 |
| ENID SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION | $1,500 |
| MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES | $1,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $371k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Dillingham Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF ENID AND NORTHWEST OKLAHOMA INC3× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +62%
- SNSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +115%
- TDTHE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC4× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +184%
Funded once
- WPWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $18k
- NONorthern Oklahoma College Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +48%
- OWOKLAHOMA WILDLIFE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
The Foundation's primary purpose is to provide resources and to seek external support for scholarships, faculty development, equipment, and campus projects, which support Eastern Oklahoma State College, a community college in Southeast…
To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students
Oklahoma Tennis Foundation positively impacts lives by supporting & funding organizations that promote tennis & education throughout the great State of Oklahoma.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…
Provides education and certification programs for independent insurance agents
The Opportunity Scholarship Fund is a scholarship granting organization that provides scholarships to Oklahoma prek-12 students to attend accredited private schools in our state. Once a student has received a scholarship, that student and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pokes With a Purpose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WARRIORS FOR FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ENID AND NORTHWEST OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Cherokee Strip Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Enid Sports Association ↗
- Who funds SIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DENNY PRICE FAMILY YMCA OF ENID OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds Bennie's Barn Inc ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Northern Oklahoma College Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds ENID HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BETA OF PI BETA PHI INC ↗
- Who funds Pokes With A Purpose Inc ↗
- Who funds 4R Kids Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ENID SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harris Foundation Inc · Allen Family Charitable Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Park Avenue Thrift Inc · Northwest Oklahoma Osteopathic Foundation · Cherokee Strip Community Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dillingham Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.