Skip to content
Dilbeck Realtors & Associates Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Dilbeck Realtors & Associates Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$5kHousing & Shelter$4kYouth Development$3kCivil Rights$2kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$1kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AHEAD WITH HORSES$3,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES$1,000
THE WIDOWS TREASURE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ABILITY FIRST: $1k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%KARE YOUTH LEAGUE: $500 → 14%Kare Youth League: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The California Home for the Aged Inc Dba California Armenian Home

Building on the legacy and vision of our founders, the california armenian home, as a progressively lead non-profit community, is committed to provide a one-of-a-kind, people centered, planned senior community to serve all levels of senior…

Health
2
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
3
Lafh Permanent Housing Corp

Lafh permanent housing corp. i (casa central) has been established to own a 6-unit complex located in los angeles, california, which provides permanent housing for families with low income.

Housing & Shelter
4
Burbank Housingsr Corporation

To own and operate affordable rental housing.

—
5
Wheels of Hope La
Human Services
6
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Los Angeles

Habitat for humanity of greater los angeles brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
7
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
8
Los Angeles Accessible Apartments C
—
9
New Image Shelter Inc

Providing nbsp;temporary nbsp;shelter nbsp;for nbsp;the nbsp;homeless nbsp;family nbsp;housing nbsp;and nbsp;resource nbsp;services

Housing & Shelter
10
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
11
A Sense of Home

A sense of home (asoh) is a los angeles based nonprofit organization that creates homes for foster youth who've aged out of the foster care system. the organization utilizes furniture, houseware and money donations to create the first home…

Human Services
12
Habitat for Humanity of La Plata County Inc

To build decent, affordable homes in partnership with families in need.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Family Housing Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Armenian Bone Marrow Donor Registry Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE WEST: $1,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTWest Valley Boys & Girls Club Inc: $1,000 · OtherWest Valley Boys & Girls Club IncPOLICE UNITY TOUR: $500 · OtherPOLICE UNITY TOURLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $435 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONThe Widows Treasure: $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Widows TreasureKARE YOUTH LEAGUE: $1,000 · Human ServicesKARE YOUTH LEAGUEABILITYFIRST: $1,000 · Human ServicesABILITYFIRSTCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF L…AHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $3,000 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES IN…ARMENIAN BONE MARROW DONOR REGISTRY CORP: $500 · HealthARMENIAN BONE MARROW…CASA OF LOS ANGELES: $1,500 · Civil RightsOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $1,060 · Public BenefitHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterPen & Napkin: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,935Human Services$4,000Health$3,500Civil Rights$1,500Public Benefit$1,060Housing & Shelter$1,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $1,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Widows Treasure: $1,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetKARE YOUTH LEAGUE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYFIRST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Valley Boys & Girls Club Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $435 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC11.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dilbeck Realtors & Associates Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dilbeck Realtors & Associates Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dilbeck Realtors & Associates’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home