Loading…
· Private foundation
DILBECK REALTORS & ASSOCIATES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$5k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants
1
Communities
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of DILBECK REALTORS & ASSOCIATES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2022 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
- AHEAD WITH HORSES$3,000
- THE WIDOWS TREASURE$1,000
- CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES$1,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The California Home for the Aged Inc
Building on the legacy and vision of our founders, the california armenian home, as a progressively lead non-profit community, is committed to provide a one-of-a-kind, people centered, planned senior community to serve all levels of senior…
Health
2
Burbank Housingsr Corporation
The corporation owns, operates, and manages affordable rental housing.
—
3
Lafh Temporary Housing Corp I
Welfare see page 2 for further details.
—
4
Los Angeles Accessible Apartments C
—
5
L a Works Inc
L.a. works mobilizes angelenos as volunteers to strengthen the fabric of los angeles.
Unclassified
6
Christian Outreach Appeal
Established in 1981, Christian Outreach in Action (COA) is a non-denominational non-profit organization whose mission is to transform the lives of homeless and impoverished individuals in Long Beach and surrounding areas so they may reach…
—
7
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor
The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…
—
8
A Sense of Home
A sense of home (asoh) is a los angeles based nonprofit organization that creates homes for foster youth who've aged out of the foster care system. the organization utilizes furniture, houseware and money donations to create the first home…
Human Services
9
Housing Equity & Advocacy Resource Team
Housing equity advocacy resource team heart l.a., is a nonprofit public interest law firm that provides legal representation and advocacy to keep people and their companion animals housed.
Human Services
10
Los Angeles Jewish Home for the Aging
Nursing, residential and clinical care for the elderly.
Community Improvement
11
Ciudad De Angeles Inc
Ciudad de Angeles provides a safe and healthy home for orphaned, abandoned, abused and needy children living in Mexico.
Human Services
12
Worthy of Love
Worthy of Love sponsors incredible birthday celebrations for children experiencing homelessness in Los Angeles for over 8 years.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home Again Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Armenian Bone Marrow Donor Registry Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$7,935Health$3,500Human Services$3,000Civil Rights$1,500Public Benefit$1,060Community Improvement$1,000Housing & Shelter$1,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AHEAD WITH HORSES ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds OPERATION GRATITUDE ↗
- Who funds PEN & NAPKIN ↗
- Who funds THE WIDOWS TREASURE ↗
- Who funds Kare Youth League ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of the Verdugos ↗
- Who funds ARMENIAN BONE MARROW DONOR REGISTRY ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Network for GoodDC10.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation DILBECK REALTORS & ASSOCIATES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE WIDOWS TREASURE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.2× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 463353015 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE WIDOWS TREASURE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Dilbeck Realtors & Associates Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dilbeck Realtors & Associates Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines