Skip to content

· Public charity

Digital Promise Global

Digital promise is a global nonprofit working to expand opportunity for each learner.

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$564k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$45MScience & Tech$1.8MEmployment$371kHuman Services$270kYouth Development$230kInternational$177kSocial Science$166kCivil Rights$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 49 grants below total $4,736,909, the rows itemized in this filing. The $20,604,649 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,867,740 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $422k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$52,500
Median grant
21
States reached
$141M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$564,000
SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA$541,500
CITY OF NORWALK$293,500
CITY OF NORWALK$285,500
ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$234,000
HELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$228,000
RAHWAY BOARD OF EDUCATION$191,000
WHITEHALL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$190,000
FRONTIER SCHOOLS INC$178,000
HUDSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$176,000
AMIRA LEARNING INC$131,036
CLEVELAND MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$125,000
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY FLORIDA$122,500
ALBUQUERQUE SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE$98,000
NAPA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION$98,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOUNTAIN LAKE PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL INC: $2k → 14%TIDES CENTERMAKER ED INITIATIVE: $258k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $10k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40M · 63 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

63 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
74

Total granted

$40M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+26%

Still filing today

24%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEmploymentHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1.9M · revenue +32%
  • MDRC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +36%
  • ED
    EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHICAGO CONNECTED
    2× · 2023–2024 · $741k
  • SC
    SHELBY COUNTY SCHOOLS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $576k
  • TI
    THINKCERCACOM INC
    one grant, 2020 · $434k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
2
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
3
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
4
Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education
5
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
6
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
7
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

—
8
The New American Academy Charter School

The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…

Education
9
The National Center on Education and the Economy

The Center is dedicated to providing tools the nation needs to lead the world in education & training in a swiftly globalizing world economy.

Public Benefit
10
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
11
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
12
Leading Educators Inc

Leading educators partners with school systems to build and sustain the conditions, teaching, and leadership to ensure that the students furthest from opportunity succeed in school and in life.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEARNING OVATIONS: $4,492,891 · OtherLEARNING OVATIONSHouston Independent Sch Dist: $2,490,000 · OtherHouston Independent Sch DistTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $1,920,000 · OtherATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,420,000 · OtherMIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,393,500 · OtherUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 259 WICHITA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,387,000 · OtherTHE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY: $1,385,500 · Other+119 more: $26,204,783 · Other+119 moreMATER ACADEMY INC: $1,065,500 · EducationMATER ACADEMY OF NEVADA: $437,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $373,939 · EducationFRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $356,250 · EducationHELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $228,000 · EducationREAD FOUNDATION DBA MEMPHIS SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE: $210,000 · EducationFRONTIER SCHOOLS INC: $178,000 · Education+13 more: $504,300 · EducationMDRC: $1,206,212 · EmploymentJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $45,000 · EmploymentWGBH Educational Foundation: $1,202,528 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $42,000 · Arts & CultureSRI INTERNATIONAL: $1,026,247 · Science & TechTIDES CENTER: $257,675 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesMaker Education Initiative: $222,475 · Youth Development
Other$40,693,674Education$3,352,989Employment$1,251,212Arts & Culture$1,244,528Science & Tech$1,026,247Human Services$269,675Youth Development$222,475

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $1,920,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMDRC: $1,206,212 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $1,205,238 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $1,202,528 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMATER ACADEMY INC: $1,065,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSRI INTERNATIONAL: $1,026,247 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ADVANCED INFORMATION AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY: $475,643 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMATER ACADEMY OF NEVADA: $437,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $373,939 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $356,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCRESCENT CITY SCHOOLS: $321,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $257,675 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $228,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMaker Education Initiative: $222,475 over 1y, 11% of budgetREAD FOUNDATION DBA MEMPHIS SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE: $210,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFRONTIER SCHOOLS INC: $178,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc: $110,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetACHIEVING THE DREAM INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER: $96,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc: $84,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATHEMATICAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $48,915 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMITS EDUCATION: $44,800 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetEDITORIAL PROJECTS IN EDUCATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION: $21,257 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALGIERS CHARTER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARISE SCHOOLS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL STUDENT CLEARINGHOUSE: $19,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL: $14,967 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRICHARD WRIGHT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL FOR JOURNALISM AND MEDIA ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Network of State Teachers of the Year: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAssemble Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAMELBACK VENTURES: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEAN LAB INC LEAN LAB EDUCATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCatalyst Education Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN LAKE PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds MDRC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MATER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SRI INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ADVANCED INFORMATION AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds MATER ACADEMY OF NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Project Lead the Way IncIN78.6× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Project Lead the Way Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · National Center for Research in Advanced Information and Digital Technology · Project Lead the Way Inc · Share Our Strength · Good Sports Inc · Save the Music Foundation · Round It Up America Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · The George W Bush Foundation · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · I Car Education Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Digital Promise Global funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Digital Promise Global. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Education Development Center Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Mater Academy Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Achieving the Dream Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 157 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Digital Promise Global’s filings →

More from the funding graph