Skip to content
Diermeier Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Diermeier Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$924k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$493k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Diermeier Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Collier County Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 24 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Diermeier Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $924k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’18
11
’19
11
’20
9
’21
10
’22
6
’23
11
’24
24
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$2.4MPhilanthropy$1.9MYouth Development$1.9MHuman Services$601kHealth$430kHousing & Shelter$200kReligion$72kPublic Benefit$61kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $290k
  • $250k+1 grant · $493k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$492,750
UCAN$210,000
THE GUADALUPE CENTER$80,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$30,000
THE COMMUNITY HOUSE$25,000
CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING$25,000
PATHWAYS EARLY EDUCATION CENTER OF IMMOKALEE$20,000
ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE$20,000
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS$10,000
OPERATION DEPLOYED INC$5,400
NAPLES PATHWAYS COALITION$5,000
CATO INSTITUTE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $30k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 7%UCAN: $207k → 14%UCAN: $200k → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20k → 7%CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 14%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $25k → 10%OPERATION DEPLOYED INC: $5k → 7%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $10k → 10%OPERATION DEPLOYED INC: $5k → 7%UCAN: $260k → 14%UCAN: $255k → 14%UCAN: $220k → 14%UCAN: $215k → 14%UCAN: $210k → 14%UCAN: $105k → 14%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $5k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $95k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $80k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $80k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $80k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $50k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $30k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $30k → 10%THE GUADALUPE CENTER: $25k → 10%REDLAND CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN INC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
OH
PA
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 16 repeat orgs$683k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$5.1M
$465k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+100%

Still filing today

94%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +43%
  • U
    UCAN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +66%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $470k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2018 · $265k
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LIFE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • CC
    CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Collier County Child Advocacy Council Inc

The mission of the organization is to improve the lives of abused children in collier county and the vision is to create a community where child abuse is not tolerated.

Civil Rights
2
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
3
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
4
Camelot Community Care Inc

To develop and provide services that enable children and families to realize their fullest potential.

Human Services
5
Child Advocacy Center Inc

A comprehensive, child-friendly facility where professionals from law enforcement, medical, child protection and therapeutic services collaborate to meet the individual needs of child victims and break the cycle of abuse.

Crime & Legal
6
Childnet Inc

Childnet's mission is to protect broward and palm beach counties' abused, abandoned and neglected children, to ensure their safety and to promptly provide them with a permanent, loving home.

Human Services
7
Institute for Child and Family Health Inc

The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.

—
8
Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children

Provides college scholarships and mentoring programs for deserving low-income children whose household income falls below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines from middle school through college.

Crime & Legal
9
Lighthouse Central Florida Inc

Charting a course for living, learning, and earning with vision loss.

Human Services
10
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
11
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
12
Central Florida Commission On Homelessness Inc

The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation of Central Illinois Depositor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
17/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,842,500 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $265,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING: $183,898 · OtherCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING+16 more: $307,015 · Other+16 moreUCAN: $1,672,275 · Human ServicesUCANGuadalupe Center Inc: $470,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center IncTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE+7 more: $91,400 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,844,244 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOU…+2 more: $35,000 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200,000 · HealthWellness House: $145,000 · HealthDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $70,000 · Health+2 more: $15,000 · HealthGUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC: $189,750 · Youth DevelopmentPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE VARSITY COLLECTIVE CHARITABLE FUND INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $58,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE: $3,000 · Public Benefit
Other$2,598,413Human Services$2,433,675Education$1,879,244Health$430,000Youth Development$209,750Philanthropy$80,000Public Benefit$61,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,844,244 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,842,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetUCAN: $1,672,275 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $470,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $200,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC: $189,750 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetWellness House: $145,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $58,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VARSITY COLLECTIVE CHARITABLE FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS DEPOSITOR: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPathways Early Education Center of Immokalee Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCASA LAKE COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION DEPLOYED INC: $10,400 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNaples Pathways Coalition Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNaples Concert Band Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The League Club IncCollier Community Fou…The Richard M Schulze…Carol B Phelon Founda…Clark Family Foundati…Naples Children Found…The Dupage Community …The Chicago Community…The Martin Foundation…United Way of Collier…Suncoast Credit Union…The Ayco Charitable F…
The League Club IncFL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The League Club Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Carol B Phelon Foundation · Clark Family Foundation Inc · Naples Children Foundation Inc · The Dupage Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Martin Foundation Inc · United Way of Collier and the Keys Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diermeier Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diermeier Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • David Lawrence Mental Health Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Diermeier Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home