Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diego Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$45kHuman Services$12kHealth$8kHousing & Shelter$6kPhilanthropy$5kAnimals$3kScience & Tech$3kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$281k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYAB FOUNDATION$3,520
CARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL$2,510
HAMILTON COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES$2,500
CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING$2,500
CARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
HAMILTON COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES$2,500
WE ARE DWYER FOUNDATION$656
ST CLARE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$350
THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY$250
CHRISTY'S SCHOOL SUPPLY FUND$250
NYAB FOUNDATION$112
FL CHARITY GOLF EVENTS LLC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GIRLS WHO CODE: $1k → 17%NOT YOUR AVERAGE BEAR FOUNDATION: $4k → 4%CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%PLACE OF HOPE: $2k → 11%PLACE FOR HOPE: $1k → 11%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
CA
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 8 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +125% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
26

Total granted

$42k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+24%

Still filing today

63%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • CA
    CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +190%
  • SL
    SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • AP
    ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +49%
  • NY
    NOT YOUR AVERAGE BEAR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +24%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
2
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
3
El Paso Guidance Center Inc dba El Paso Child Guidance Center

Improving the health and well-being of children and families in a safe environment through mental health services, education and awareness.

—
4
Children's Advocacy Center of Southwest Florida Inc

Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…

Human Services
5
Apollo's Pals Sanctuary Rehabiliation and Adoption Inc

At apollo's pals sanctuary rehabilitation and adoption inc., we are driven by the enduring love and gentle spirit of our namesake, apollo a faithful companion who brought unwavering comfort and joy to our family. in his honor, we dedicate…

Animals
6
Pediatric Oncology Support Team Inc

The mission of post is to help local children and their families courageously fight cancer by giving them compassionate emotional and financial support. post's multidisciplinary team of dedicated, caring professionals provide free,…

Health
7
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
8
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
9
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
10
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
12
Harbor House of Central Florida Inc

Harbor house strives to prevent and break the cycle of domestic abuse through empowerment-based programs, advocacy, education, and community involvement.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Child Counseling Inc; the most unlike its peers is Not Your Average Bear Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL INC: $13,910 · OtherCARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL INCST CLARE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $8,550 · OtherST CLARE CATHOLIC SCHOOLALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $5,960 · OtherALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESSHAMILTON COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $5,000 · OtherHAMILTON COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEESUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDANYAB FOUNDATION: $3,632 · OtherNYAB FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $2,500 · OtherFLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Other+18 more: $12,366 · Other+18 moreCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 · Human ServicesCHASIN A DREAM FO…NOT YOUR AVERAGE BEAR FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Human ServicesNOT YOUR AVERAGE …SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSELFLESS LOVE FOU…PLACE OF HOPE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesPLACE OF HOPE INCGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,472 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE IN…CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC: $5,000 · EducationCENTER FOR C…FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationFRANKLIN & M…CANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC: $2,000 · EducationCANCER ALLIA…ALINA'S LIGHT INC: $500 · EducationPet Cottage Inc: $1,500 · AnimalsTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $750 · AnimalsLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 · Science & TechSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $647 · Recreation & Sports
Other$59,418Human Services$13,572Education$10,000Animals$2,250Science & Tech$2,000Recreation & Sports$647

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $5,960 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNOT YOUR AVERAGE BEAR FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPet Cottage Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,472 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $647 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALINA'S LIGHT INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NOT YOUR AVERAGE BEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Pet Cottage Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALINA'S LIGHT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Children's Healthcare Charity IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diego Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diego Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Center for Child Counseling Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The New England Center for Children Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Diego Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph