Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diamantine Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.5MHuman Services$760kHealth$313kReligion$250kFood & Nutrition$225kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kArts & Culture$10kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$139k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALESIAN COLLEGE PREP$80,000
MOREAU CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$35,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$25,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MISSION SAN JOSE$10,000
CHRISTO REY DE LA SALLE$10,000
ADVOKIDS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 10%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $100k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 10%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 25 repeat orgs$570k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
9

Total granted

$2.6M
$430k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+54%

Still filing today

36%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NV
    NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +11%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    2× · 2022–2023 · $125k · revenue +14%
  • SJ
    ST JUDE HOSPITAL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SL
    St Leander Elementary school
    one grant, 2022 · $285k
  • UC
    UCSF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • WW
    WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
5
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
8
Family Caregiver Alliance

To support and assist caregivers of adults with chronic diseases and conditions through education, services, research and advocacy.

Health
9
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
10
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
11
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
12
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Caring Services; the most unlike its peers is Oakland Elizabeth House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LEANDER SCHOOL: $500,000 · OtherST LEANDER SCHOOLSt Leander Elementary school: $285,404 · OtherSt Leander Elementary schoolBISHOP O'DOWD HIGH SCHOOL: $262,500 · OtherBISHOP O'DOWD HIGH SCHOOLST LEANDER CHURCH: $207,500 · OtherST LEANDER CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $177,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCRISTO REY DE LA SALLE HS: $150,000 · OtherCRISTO REY DE LA SALLE HSNORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE INC: $150,000 · OtherNORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE INCALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $125,000 · OtherST LEANDER'S SCHOOL: $105,000 · OtherST ANTHONY FREE DINING ROOM: $100,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $90,000 · Other+19 more: $396,000 · Other+19 moreNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $150,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE HOSPITAL: $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $90,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropySAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $50,500 · EducationPiedmont Choirs dba Piedmont East Bay Childrens Choir: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOakland Elizabeth House: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,548,904Human Services$220,000Health$200,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$50,500Arts & Culture$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $150,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE HOSPITAL: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $50,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPiedmont Choirs dba Piedmont East Bay Childrens Choir: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOakland Elizabeth House: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetADVOKIDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Piedmont Choirs dba Piedmont East Bay Childrens Choir ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Elizabeth House ↗
  • Who funds ADVOKIDS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diamantine Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diamantine Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Diamantine Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Diamantine Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diamantine Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph