Skip to content
Dexter a & M Patricia McCormick Fam Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Dexter a & M Patricia McCormick Fam Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$123kHuman Services$108kEducation$48kFood & Nutrition$33kHealth$19kEnvironment$12kInternational$10kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k44 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
$1,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$29,500
MISSION GUATEMALA$23,550
PROJECT ROUJ$10,500
PIONEERS$5,000
BGOLDEN$4,500
WESTFIELD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
PHEASANTS FOREVER$2,750
YOU FEED THEM MFP$2,555
ZIONSVILLE PARKS FOUNDATION$2,500
FOOD GATHERERS$2,500
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$2,500
SAWS$2,500
ROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY N$2,500
INDIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDRENS$2,000
VINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%APPLE PLAYSCHOOLS: $250 → 14%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $350 → 12%INDIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 5%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $250 → 12%STRIDES TO SUCESS: $100 → 5%A LONGER TABLE: $2k → 16%PROJECT ROUJ: $11k → 5%PATACHOU FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%ZANMI FONDWA: $4k → 5%ZANMI FONDWA: $3k → 5%PATACHOU FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%ZANMI FONDWA: $3k → 5%ZANMI FONDWA: $3k → 5%PATACHOU FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%PROJECT ROUJ: $3k → 5%PATACHOU FOUNDATION: $200 → 16%PATACHOU FOUNDATION: $200 → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK INC: $3k → 16%INDIANA DIAPER BANK: $2k → 16%ZANMI FONDWA: $500 → 5%INDIANA DIAPER BANK: $750 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $1k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $500 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $250 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $250 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $200 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
NM
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$277k · 35 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
48

Total granted

$277k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+22%

Still filing today

49%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +2%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • VU
    VINCENNES UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -80%
  • KC
    KNOX COUNTY CISMA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
2
Indy Hunger Network Inc

The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.

Food & Nutrition
3
Glean Kentucky Inc

Glean kentucky nourishes kentucky's hungry by rescuing and redistributing surplus fresh foods.

Food & Nutrition
4
Hoosier Hills Food Bank Inc

Hoosier hills food bank collects, stores, and distributes nutritious food products to non-profit organizations, which provide free feeding programs that serve both ill and needy families and individuals in monroe, martin, owen, orange,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys Inc

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Employment
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Goodwill Industries of Denver

Goodwill's mission is to provide education, career development, and employment opportunities to help coloradans in need achieve self-sufficiency, dignity, and hope through the power of work.

—
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
10
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
11
Kentucky Harvest Inc

Kentucky harvest's purpose is to end local hunger by connecting with food donors and engaging volunteers to rescue excess food and move it from those who have it to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gcc Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
30/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZIONSVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $80,450 · OtherZIONSVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $29,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVINCENNES UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherBGOLDEN: $8,550 · Other+79 more: $110,694 · Other+79 moreMission Guatemala Inc: $65,300 · Human ServicesMission Guatemala IncPROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION: $25,050 · Human ServicesPROJECT ROUJ CORPORATIONA LONGER TABLE INC: $3,900 · Human Services+7 more: $9,150 · Human Services+7 moreVINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · EducationGOLDEN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,550 · EducationSOUTH KNOX EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist University: $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · HealthMINISTRY VILLAGE AT OLIVE INC: $3,000 · HealthMOTT HEALTH CARE CENTER: $1,000 · HealthSACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC: $600 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $593 · Health+3 more: $300 · HealthFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $8,150 · Food & NutritionGOLDEN BACKPACK PROGRAM INC: $650 · Food & NutritionZIONSVILLE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentHOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentINDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INC: $500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $250 · EnvironmentWORLD VISION INC: $4,782 · International
Other$241,194Human Services$103,400Education$19,550Health$9,493Food & Nutrition$8,800Environment$5,250International$4,782

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMission Guatemala Inc: $65,300 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetPROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION: $25,050 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetVINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $8,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $7,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $4,782 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA LONGER TABLE INC: $3,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMINISTRY VILLAGE AT OLIVE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetServants at Work Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $2,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF BOONE COUNTY INC: $2,320 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA DIAPER BANK INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORCHLIGHT A FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,550 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE JEANS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $1,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH KNOX EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMOTT HEALTH CARE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN BACKPACK PROGRAM INC: $650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSACRED HEART FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $593 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANISTEE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE ON WINGS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEEDS OF CARING: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA MILITARY MUSEUM INC: $355 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGCC FOUNDATION INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society for Hamilton County: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOLDEN FIRE FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMESILLA VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAGINAW COUNTY INCORPORATED: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MORRISON THEATER COMPANY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLE PLAYSCHOOLS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIDES TO SUCCESS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mission Guatemala Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds VINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds A LONGER TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MINISTRY VILLAGE AT OLIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ZIONSVILLE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF BOONE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA DIAPER BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PORCHLIGHT A FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncCentral Indiana Commu…Hamilton County Commu…Samerian Foundation I…Duke Energy FoundationNicholas H Noyes Jr M…The Indianapolis Foun…Community Foundation …Eugene & Marilyn Glic…Richard M Fairbanks F…Community Foundation …United Way of Central…
Lilly Endowment IncIN30.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Samerian Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Boone County Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dexter a & M Patricia McCormick Fam Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dexter a & M Patricia McCormick Fam Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dexter a & M Patricia McCormick Fam’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home