Skip to content
Devary Durrill Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Devary Durrill Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$207k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$477kHuman Services$365kHousing & Shelter$335kEducation$332kYouth Development$237kArts & Culture$100kAnimals$89kCommunity Improvement$84kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS$41,500
YOUTH ODYSSEY$25,000
DRISCOLL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$13,000
UNITED CORPUS CHRISTI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,600
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$10,000
FOCUS FOUNDATION$10,000
ART CENTER OF CORPUS CHRISTI$10,000
BRINGING BAFFIN BACK SUPPORT FUND$10,000
MAJESTY OUTDOORS$10,000
SALTWATER FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSOCIATION$10,000
TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM$7,500
ART MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS$6,650
NUECES COUNTY JR LIVESTOCK SHOW$6,000
TLC COMMUNITY CENTER$5,363
POLICE OFFICERS CHRISTMAS ANGELS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HELICOPTERS FOR HEROS: $100k → 14%HELICOPTERS FOR HEROS: $50k → 14%HELICOPTERS FOR HEROS: $50k → 14%SALTWATER FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSOCIATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 34 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
40

Total granted

$1.9M
$251k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $321k · revenue +121%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    2× · 2019–2021 · $200k · revenue +74%
  • YO
    YOUTH ODYSSEY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $129k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARK ASSESSMENT CENTER AND EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR YOUTH
    one grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue -31%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • GA
    GUARDIAN ANGELS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
2
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
3
Cca Texas Fund

To support coastal conservation association in carrying out the charitable and educational purpose for which it was organized and is operated, namely, promoting and advancing the preservation, conservation and protection of marine, plant…

Environment
4
Corsicana Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote Corsicana and the surrounding area.

—
5
Texas Chapter of the American College of Cardiology

The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…

—
6
Texas a&M-Corpus Christi Foundation

For the benefit of texas a&m university - corpus christi

Education
7
Texas Clean Energy Coalition
—
8
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
9
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
10
Travis County Medical Society

Travis county medical society (tcms) represents the medical profession in matters of importance to the membership and the community it serves.

—
11
Crime Stoppers of South Texas Inc
—
12
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Helicopters for Heroes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
21/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $320,630 · OtherWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXASCENIKOR FOUNDATION: $102,500 · OtherCENIKOR FOUNDATIONTEXAS STATE AQUARIUM: $82,500 · OtherTEXAS STATE AQUARIUMHALO FLIGHT INC: $78,000 · OtherHALO FLIGHT INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CORPUS CHRISTI: $51,000 · OtherTHE ARK ASSESSMENT CENTER AND EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR YOUTH: $51,500 · Other+65 more: $576,338 · Other+65 moreDriscoll Children's Hospital: $127,271 · HealthDriscoll Chil…American Heart Association Inc: $123,500 · HealthAmerican Hear…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $19,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANC…+1 more: $2,500 · HealthTexas A&M Foundation: $200,000 · EducationTexas A&M Fo…THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $41,500 · EducationTHE ASSOCIAT…+2 more: $7,500 · EducationHELICOPTERS FOR HEROES: $200,000 · Human ServicesHELICOPTERS…CHOICE LIVING COMMUNITY: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHOICE LIVI…SALTWATER-FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCORPUS CHRISTI POLICE FOUNDATION: $8,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH ODYSSEY INC: $128,800 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND: $20,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTH TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $59,292 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK: $55,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $875 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,262,468Health$272,771Education$249,000Human Services$233,500Crime & Legal$148,800Environment$60,292Food & Nutrition$55,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $320,630 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetHELICOPTERS FOR HEROES: $200,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH ODYSSEY INC: $128,800 over 8y, 10.0% of budgetDriscoll Children's Hospital: $127,271 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $123,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENIKOR FOUNDATION: $102,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHALO FLIGHT INC: $78,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $59,292 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $41,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CORPUS CHRISTI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $35,950 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOICE LIVING COMMUNITY: $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFOCUS FOUNDATION-FOR OUR CHILDRENS ULTIMATE SUCCESS: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetMAJESTY OUTDOORS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSALTWATER-FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetWEST SIDE HELPING HAND: $9,150 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI POLICE FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSTARS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI PATCH INC: $3,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTEXAS SURF CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI POLICE ATHELTIC LEAG: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCorpus Christi Downtown Revitalization Alliance: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF CORPUS CHRISTI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Museum of Western Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCoastal Bend Bays Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTIMON'S MINISTRIES: $875 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HELICOPTERS FOR HEROES ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ODYSSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Driscoll Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENIKOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HALO FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE ARK ASSESSMENT CENTER AND EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CORPUS CHRISTI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE COASTAL BEND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHOICE LIVING COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS FOUNDATION-FOR OUR CHILDRENS ULTIMATE SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds MAJESTY OUTDOORS ↗
  • Who funds SALTWATER-FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE HELPING HAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Behmann Brothers Foun…Ed Rachal FoundationCoastal Bend Communit…The John G and Marie …Susser Family Foundat…Cheniere FoundationAllen Lovelace Moore …United Way of the Coa…American Electric Pow…Yvonne H Simard Found…Frazier Family Founda…Earl C Sams Foundatio…
Behmann Brothers FoundationTX40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Behmann Brothers Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Susser Family Foundation · Cheniere Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Yvonne H Simard Foundation · Frazier Family Foundation Inc · Earl C Sams Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Devary Durrill Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Devary Durrill Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Devary Durrill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home