Skip to content

· Public charity

Detroit Economic Growth Association

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$948k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$33MEmployment$310kFood & Nutrition$309kArts & Culture$255kScience & Tech$200kEnvironment$72kHuman Services$54kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $464k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$21,898
Median grant
1
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIA WARREN DETROIT LLC$947,525
WESTON HALL LLC$290,606
ULTREIA LLC$210,396
BUILD INSTITUTE$188,816
MILESTONE GROWTH CAPITAL INSTITUTE$65,000
HOUSE OF MORRISON'S SHOE REPAIR$33,500
THE TOWN COMPANIES LLC$25,000
KLASSIC MOBILE GARDENS LLC$24,928
LINWOOD FRESH MARKET$22,640
DISTRICT 4 MINI MARKET LLC$21,898
BRYANT PARK MARKET LLC$19,000
BOARDING HOUSE HOSPITALITY$18,731
MICHIGAN SKATELANDS INC$15,000
GIGI'S BIRDCAGE LLC$15,000
SHANTINIQUE MUSIC INC$13,144
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $8k → 21%THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT INC: $41k → 21%THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT INC: $15k → 21%DETROIT PARENT NETWORK: $10k → 21%TRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10k → 21%ANGEL LAND CHILD CARE AND PARENT INSTITUTE: $5k → 21%BLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION: $10k → 21%FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 21%DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $15k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.8M · 75 repeat orgs$24M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

75 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
903

Total granted

$9.8M
$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+11%

Still filing today

9%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DE
    DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.5M · revenue +50%
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $56k · revenue +166%
  • EcoWorks
    2× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNTY OF WAYNE MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2021 · $12M
  • SC
    SMART CITY LAB LLC
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • GA
    GROW AMERICA FUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $113k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
About Face Detroit
—
2
Dream of Detroit

Dream of Detroit is combining community organizing with strategic housing and land development to build a healthy community and empower a marginalized neighborhood on the Westside of Detroit.

Human Services
3
Detroit Land Bank Community Development Corporation

The detroit land bank community development corporation's mission is to serve the people of the city of detroit, michigan through the advancement of economic welfare, the promotion of community development, and the provision of affordable…

Community Improvement
4
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Detroit Justice Center

The Detroit Justice Center works alongside communities to create economic opportunities, transform the justice system, and promote equitable and just cities.

Crime & Legal
6
The Detroit Equity Report Inc

To promote equality and inclusion in society.

Employment
7
Arise Detroit

To inspire a community of active engagement, personal responsibility and hope by connecting people to opportunities and resources to transform the quality of life for all Detroiters.

Community Improvement
8
Detroit Progress Fund

To promote the city of detroit's turnaround and to support the mayor of the city of detroit's agenda

—
9
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
10
Connect Detroit

To strategically solve problems through collaboratives with City of Detroit Departments, nonprofit organizations and local grant makers in order to secure the maximum federal, state, and national foundation dollars for the city Detroit.

Community Improvement
11
Detroit Blight Busters Inc

Detroit blight busters, inc's mission is to stabilize, revitalize and rebuild detroit neighborhoods by demolishing, renovating and boarding up blighted homes for community use, building community partnerships and sponsoring events that…

Community Improvement
12
Doing Development Differently in Metro Detroit (D4) Coalition Inc

To build a diverse coalition of community, environmental, faith and organized labor organizations united to strengthen metro detroit through meaningful community engagement in the creation of sustainable "win-win" economic development…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Michigan Women's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Angel Land Child Care and Parent Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 990 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/77
Grantees still filing
44/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNTY OF WAYNE MICHIGAN: $11,927,248 · OtherCOUNTY OF WAYNE MICHIGANECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF DETROIT: $5,675,833 · OtherECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF DETROITDETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATION: $1,510,000 · OtherDETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATIONARIA WARREN DETROIT LLC: $947,525 · Other+186 more: $5,522,799 · Other+186 moreBUILD INSTITUTE: $268,816 · Community ImprovementMILESTONE GROWTH CAPITAL INSTITUTE: $149,500 · Community ImprovementGROW AMERICA FUND INC: $113,000 · Community ImprovementDetroit Future City: $80,564 · Community ImprovementDETROIT MOBILITY GROUP: $142,500 · EducationLIUNA Training of Michigan: $82,500 · EmploymentWK Kellogg Foundation: $66,563 · PhilanthropyTHE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT INC: $55,796 · Human ServicesEMMANUEL HOUSE 1 & 2 INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterEcoWorks: $16,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$25,583,405Community Improvement$611,880Education$142,500Employment$82,500Philanthropy$66,563Human Services$55,796Housing & Shelter$36,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATION: $1,510,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetBUILD INSTITUTE: $268,816 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetMILESTONE GROWTH CAPITAL INSTITUTE: $149,500 over 2y, 35% of budgetDETROIT MOBILITY GROUP: $142,500 over 2y, 43% of budgetGROW AMERICA FUND INC: $113,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMETRO DETROIT BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $84,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetDetroit Future City: $80,564 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetWK Kellogg Foundation: $66,563 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT INC: $55,796 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetMICHIGAN BARBER SCHOOL: $40,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC THEATRE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHANDLER PARK CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetEMMANUEL HOUSE 1 & 2 INC: $20,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetEcoWorks: $16,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BUILD INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MILESTONE GROWTH CAPITAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT MOBILITY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds GROW AMERICA FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO DETROIT BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIUNA Training of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Future City ↗
  • Who funds WK Kellogg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN BARBER SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Detroit Development FundMI30.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Detroit Development Fund · Detroit Regional Chamber Foundation Inc · The Skillman Foundation · Wayne State University Research and Technology Park in the City of Detroit · Max M & Marjorie S Fisher Foundation Inc · Prosperus Detroit Micro Lending · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Hudson-Webber Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Invest Detroit Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Detroit Economic Growth Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Detroit Economic Growth Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 990 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Detroit Economic Growth Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph