Skip to content

· Public charity

Detroit Area Agency on Aging

To educate, advocate and promote healthy aging to enable people to make choices about home and community-based services and long-term care that will improve their quality of life.

$3.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$596k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$9.0MCrime & Legal$1.2MHealth$410kCommunity Improvement$292kFood & Nutrition$91kPublic Safety & Disaster$45k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
$113,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER$595,547
ASSOC OF CHINESE AMERICANS$283,362
WAYNE COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES$269,261
THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC)$267,136
CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC$237,500
LUELLA HANNAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$230,183
LASED$220,347
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION$152,147
GENESIS HOPE$130,203
FRANKLIN WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS$122,293
DELRAY$113,000
DETROIT ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ORGANIZATION (DABO)$110,000
UNIVERSAL DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS$94,999
BRIDGING COMMUNITIES$89,873
DISABILITY NETWORK WAYNE CNTY$84,572
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSAL DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS: $95k → 8%UNIVERSAL DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS: $70k → 8%UNIVERSAL DEMENTIA CAREGIVERS: $50k → 8%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $596k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $360k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $270k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $268k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $218k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $200k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $200k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $200k → 21%ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER: $185k → 21%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES: $30k → 21%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES: $30k → 21%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES: $30k → 21%PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $175k → 21%PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $165k → 21%PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $165k → 21%PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $122k → 21%PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY SERVICES: $23k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC): $267k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC): $216k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC): $213k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC): $208k → 21%SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS: $200k → 21%DISABILITY NETWORK WAYNE CNTY: $85k → 21%SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS: $200k → 21%DISABILITY NETWORK WAYNE CNTY: $50k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC): $183k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC): $182k → 21%DISABILITY NETWORK WAYNE CNTY: $38k → 21%THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER (SOC): $141k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 32 repeat orgs$399k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
5

Total granted

$14M
$214k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +74%
  • SF
    SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +55%
  • WC
    WAYNE COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • HD
    HEALTHY DETROIT
    one grant, 2017 · $116k
  • PH
    PRECISE HEALTH CARE SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $38k
  • SI
    SENIORS IN MOTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Area Agency On Aging

To educate, advocate and promote healthy aging to enable people to make choices about home and community-based services and long-term care that will improve their quality of life.

Human Services
2
Family Service Agency of Mid Michig

Social service agency serving clients in mid-michigan.

Human Services
3
Northwest Senior Resources Inc

To serve and advocate for older adults, adults with disabilities, and caregivers by supporting their independence, dignity, and quality of life.

Human Services
4
Manistee County Council On Aging

Provide services for senior citizens both through the center and to those with limited resources or homebound.

Human Services
5
AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services

The ageways nonprofit senior services enhances the lives of older adults and adults with disabilities in the communities we serve.

Human Services
6
Brown County Senior Citizens

Senior citizens programs

—
7
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services
8
Hospice Homes of Genesee and Lapeer Counties

To provide housing and end of life care and support to terminally ill individuals.

Human Services
9
Mymichigan Home Care

Creating healthy communities - together

—
10
Lowell Area Housing Inc Dba Schneider Manor
—
11
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
12
Dependable Community Development Corporation

To provide housing for the elderly

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Service Organization; the most unlike its peers is Luella Hannan Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,319,940 · OtherLATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN…NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION: $1,287,857 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATIONLUELLA HANNAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $674,613 · OtherLUELLA HANNAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONFRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INC: $569,911 · OtherFRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INCASSOCIATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS: $469,173 · OtherASSOCIATION OF CHINESE AMERICANSCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $337,468 · OtherL & L ADULT DAY CARE INC: $254,056 · Other+18 more: $1,505,274 · Other+18 moreST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER INC: $2,496,921 · Human ServicesST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER INCSERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER: $1,810,709 · Human ServicesSERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HE…Peoples Community Services of Metropolitan Detroit: $648,954 · Human ServicesPeoples Community Services of Metropolitan…Universal Dementia Caregivers: $215,452 · Human Services+2 more: $262,204 · Human ServicesWAYNE COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES: $1,514,873 · Crime & LegalWAYNE COUNT…DELRAY UNITED ACTION COUNCIL: $404,995 · Community ImprovementGENESIS HARBOR OF OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTING EXCELLENCE: $226,539 · Community ImprovementGREATER DETROIT AGENCY FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $85,868 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $63,000 · HealthNORTH END VILLAGE NON-PROFIT: $51,197 · HealthMIGEN: $137,432 · Civil RightsTHE DETROIT ASSOC OF BLACK ORG: $110,000 · Philanthropy
Other$6,418,292Human Services$5,434,240Crime & Legal$1,514,873Community Improvement$631,534Health$200,065Civil Rights$137,432Philanthropy$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER INC: $2,496,921 over 9y, 18% of budgetSERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER: $1,810,709 over 9y, 21% of budgetWAYNE COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES: $1,514,873 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetLATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,319,940 over 9y, 27% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION: $1,287,857 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetLUELLA HANNAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $674,613 over 6y, 13% of budgetPeoples Community Services of Metropolitan Detroit: $648,954 over 5y, 23% of budgetFRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INC: $569,911 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetDELRAY UNITED ACTION COUNCIL: $404,995 over 9y, 11% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $337,468 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetL & L ADULT DAY CARE INC: $254,056 over 4y, 33% of budgetGENESIS HARBOR OF OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTING EXCELLENCE: $226,539 over 3y, 17% of budgetUniversal Dementia Caregivers: $215,452 over 3y, 83% of budgetMATRIX HUMAN SERVICES: $187,977 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK WAYNE COUNTY DETROIT: $172,204 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetMIGEN: $137,432 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetAssociation Of Chinese Americans Inc: $91,139 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetBRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC: $90,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetGREATER DETROIT AGENCY FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $85,868 over 5y, 11% of budgetCHANCE FOR LIFE ORGANIZATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $63,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH END VILLAGE NON-PROFIT: $51,197 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVICES CORPORATION: $31,926 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST PATRICK SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds LUELLA HANNAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Peoples Community Services of Metropolitan Detroit ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN-WRIGHT SETTLEMENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DELRAY UNITED ACTION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds L & L ADULT DAY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS HARBOR OF OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTING EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Universal Dementia Caregivers ↗
  • Who funds MATRIX HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY NETWORK WAYNE COUNTY DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds MIGEN ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT ASSOC OF BLACK ORG ↗
  • Who funds Association Of Chinese Americans Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER DETROIT AGENCY FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds CHANCE FOR LIFE ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH END VILLAGE NON-PROFIT ↗
  • Who funds DEAF & HEARING IMPAIRED SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI39.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Comerica Charitable Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Metro Health Foundation · Mary Thompson Foundation · McGregor Fund · Wayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc · Ford Philanthropy · The Kresge Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Detroit Area Agency on Aging funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Detroit Area Agency on Aging. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Detroit Area Agency on Aging’s filings →

    More from the funding graph