Skip to content
Detroit & Wayne County Tuberculosis Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Detroit & Wayne County Tuberculosis Foundation

The organizations mission is to provide hospitals and health care organizations located within the michigan counties of wayne, oakland, macomb, st.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$18M
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.5M
$98,688
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL$140,016
COREWELL HEALTH FARMINGTON HILLS$131,235
HENRY FORD ST JOHN$123,209
COREWELL HEALTH TROY$120,642
HENRY FORD NOVI$117,650
MCLAREN MACOMB$115,453
COREWELL HEALTH TRENTON$114,560
COREWELL HEALTH DEARBORN$114,035
COREWELL HEALTH WAYNE$107,726
HENRY FORD WYANDOTTE HOSPITAL$107,351
MCLAREN OAKLAND$105,753
HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL$99,349
HENRY FORD RIVER DISTRICT$98,688
MCLAREN PORT HURON$97,024
HENRY FORD SOUTHFIELD$97,008
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL ROYAL OAK: $131k → 8%MCLAREN LAPEER REGIONAL MED CTR: $126k → 10%DECKERVILLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $177k → 14%COREWELL HEALTH WAYNE: $120k → 21%COREWELL HEALTH ROYAL OAK: $117k → 8%MCLAREN LAPEER REGIONAL MED CTR: $118k → 10%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL WAYNE: $112k → 21%ASCENSION MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSPITAL W: $100k → 10%MCLAREN LAPEER REGIONAL MED CTR: $112k → 10%COREWELL HEALTH WAYNE: $108k → 21%MCLAREN LAPEER REGIONAL MED CTR: $108k → 10%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL WAYNE: $105k → 21%ASCENSION MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSPITAL W: $100k → 10%MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $140k → 14%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL WAYNE: $103k → 21%MARLETTE RETIONAL HOSPITAL: $104k → 14%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL WAYNE: $103k → 21%MCLAREN PORT HURON: $136k → 13%MCLAREN PORT HURON: $112k → 13%MCLAREN PORT HURON: $106k → 13%COREWELL HEALTH TAYLOR: $141k → 21%MCLAREN PORT HURON: $103k → 13%COREWELL HEALTH TRENTON: $115k → 21%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL TRENTON: $106k → 21%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL TAYLOR: $101k → 21%MCLAREN MACOMB: $115k → 10%ASCENSION PROVIDENCE ROCHESTER FOUN: $134k → 8%ASCENSION PROVIDENCE ROCHESTER FOUN: $120k → 8%COREWELL HEALTH FARMINGTON HILLS: $131k → 8%COREWELL HEALTH FARMINGTON HILLS: $126k → 8%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL FARMINGTON HILLS: $122k → 8%COREWELL HEALTH FARMINGTON HILLS: $114k → 8%COREWELL HEALTH TROY: $121k → 8%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL TROY: $104k → 8%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL TROY: $100k → 8%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL TROY: $100k → 8%COREWELL HEALTH TROY: $100k → 8%BEAUMONT HOSPITAL GROSSE POINTE: $121k → 21%HENRY FORD WYANDOTTE HOSPITAL: $107k → 21%ASCENSION MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSPITAL: $100k → 8%HENRY FORD ST JOHN: $123k → 21%ASCENSION ST JOHN HOSPITAL: $103k → 21%MCLAREN OAKLAND: $106k → 8%COREWELL HEALTH GROSSE POINTE: $114k → 8%COREWELL HEALTH GROSSE POINTE: $111k → 8%HENRY FORD NOVI: $118k → 8%ASCENSION PROVIDENCE PK HOSP NOVI: $117k → 8%ASCENSION PROVIDENCE PK HOSP NOVI: $114k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 19 repeat orgs$376k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$18M
$268k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+14%

Still filing today

79%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +69%
  • OH
    OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +0%
  • WB
    WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • MD
    METROPOLITAN DETROIT CHORALE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $74k · revenue +14%
  • SJ
    ST JOHN MADISON HEIGHTS CAMPUS
    one grant, 2017 · $70k
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $66k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Henry Ford Health Genesys Hospital

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
2
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation

Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…

Health
3
Henry Ford Health Rochester Hospital

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
4
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
5
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
6
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
7
Henry Ford Health Genesys Foundation

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
8
Henry Ford Semi Medical Group

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
9
Henry Ford Southeast Michigan Community Health

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
10
Ascension Michigan

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Human Services
11
St John Providence

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
12
Henry Ford Health Brighton Center for Recovery

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related organization of the filing entity, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Ford Health Macomb Oakland Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Detroit Chorale Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,686,463 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATIONHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $2,067,629 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION: $2,011,399 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATIONOAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC: $1,824,979 · HealthOAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INCWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL: $1,293,543 · HealthWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITALTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $932,900 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGANMCLAREN LAPEER REGION: $839,371 · HealthMCLAREN LAPEER REGIONMCLAREN MACOMB: $728,388 · HealthMCLAREN OAKLAND: $619,474 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL: $520,553 · Health+8 more: $1,854,628 · Health+8 morePORT HURON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $905,790 · OtherPORT HURO…COREWELL HEALTH FARMINGTON HILLS: $465,346 · OtherCOREWELL …COREWELL HEALTH WAYNE: $107,726 · OtherCOREWELL …ST JOHN MADISON HEIGHTS CAMPUS: $70,400 · OtherHENRY FORD HEALTH PROVIDENCE FOUNDATION: $1,103,038 · PhilanthropyMETROPOLITAN DETROIT CHORALE INC: $73,767 · Arts & Culture
Health$15,379,327Other$1,549,262Philanthropy$1,103,038Arts & Culture$73,767

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,686,463 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $2,067,629 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION: $2,011,399 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetOAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC: $1,824,979 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL: $1,293,543 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH PROVIDENCE FOUNDATION: $1,103,038 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $932,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPORT HURON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $905,790 over 9y, 21% of budgetMCLAREN LAPEER REGION: $839,371 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMCLAREN MACOMB: $728,388 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMCLAREN OAKLAND: $619,474 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL: $520,553 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH ROCHESTER FOUNDATION: $384,124 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetMARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $364,556 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL: $313,312 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDECKERVILLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $287,286 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMCKENZIE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MCKENZIE HEALTH SYSTEM: $235,386 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH MACOMB OAKLAND HOSPITAL: $145,963 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN HOSPITAL: $66,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH RIVER DISTRICT HOSPITAL: $57,601 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH PROVIDENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds PORT HURON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN LAPEER REGION ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN MACOMB ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH ROCHESTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARLETTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds DECKERVILLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MCKENZIE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MCKENZIE HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH MACOMB OAKLAND HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN DETROIT CHORALE INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH RIVER DISTRICT HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan Health & Hos…Henry Ford Health St …Michigan Health Endow…Henry Ford Health Pro…Michigan Center for R…The Carls FoundationCommunity Foundation …American Heart Associ…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Michigan Health & Hospital Association Dba MhaMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan Health & Hospital Association Dba Mha · Henry Ford Health St John Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Henry Ford Health Providence Foundation · Michigan Center for Rural Health · The Carls Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · American Heart Association Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Detroit & Wayne County Tuberculosis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Detroit & Wayne County Tuberculosis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Detroit & Wayne County Tuberculosis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Detroit & Wayne County Tuberculosis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Detroit & Wayne County Tuberculosis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home