Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dennis D and Geri Georg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$36kFood & Nutrition$13kAnimals$12kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$104k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY$4,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$2,000
SANDIE PREP SCHOOL$1,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM$1,000
NOCO HUMANE SOCIETY$500
ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION$500
ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%ANIMAL HUMANE NEW MEXICO: $1k → 14%ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%ROHIRWYN EQUESTRIAN & REHAB: $500 → 9%FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY: $4k → 11%SANDIE PREP SCHOOL: $2k → 14%ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY: $2k → 11%SANDIE PREP SCHOOL: $1k → 14%ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY: $2k → 11%SANDIE PREP SCHOOL: $1k → 14%ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY: $2k → 11%SANDIE PREP SCHOOL: $1k → 14%ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $250 → 9%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY: $2k → 11%SANDIE PREP SCHOOL: $500 → 14%ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $250 → 9%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY: $1k → 11%SANDIE PREP SCHOOL: $500 → 14%LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY: $250 → 17%LARIMER HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY: $250 → 17%LARIMER HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY: $250 → 17%LARIMER HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY: $250 → 17%LARIMER HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%LARIMER HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 11%NOCO HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $1k → 11%ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 10 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$62k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+35%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer County
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +21%
  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +49%
  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • AH
    ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +35%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
2
New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc

The mission of new mexico state university foundation is to foster long-term relationships with our alumni, supporters, and community in order to secure, manage, steward, and protect a sustainable source of private resources that will…

Education
3
University of Northern Colorado Foundation

The foundation is entrusted to provide support and steward donations for the university of northern colorado.

Education
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
7
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
Northern State University Foundation

The Northern State University Foundation is dedicated to securing the future of Northern State University. Its purpose is to solicit and administer funds and to pursue other activities to advance this goal.

—
10
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
11
Northern Illinois University Foundation

The niu foundation's mission is to energize and connect the private sector with the niu community to secure and steward resources that support the future and growth of niu.

Education
12
Iowa State University Alumni Association

To facilitate the lifetime connection of alumni, students, and friends with iowa state university and each other.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Noco Humane. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INCThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $13,000 · Food & NutritionThe Food Bank for Larim…SANDIE PREP SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherSANDIE PREP SCHOOLALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherALGONA COMMUNITY SCH…ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $1,250 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL C…LUTHERAN CAMPUS MINISTRY: $1,000 · OtherLUTHERAN CAMPUS MINI…Individual grant recipient: $500 · OtherNOCO HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $6,000 · EnvironmentROCKY MOUN…Noco Humane: $4,500 · AnimalsNoco Huma…ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $1,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HU…
Education$27,500Food & Nutrition$13,000Other$11,750Environment$6,000Animals$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNoco Humane: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Noco Humane ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALGONA COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dennis D and Geri Georg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dennis D and Geri Georg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dennis D and Geri Georg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph