Skip to content

· Private foundation

Denman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$230kYouth Development$215kHuman Services$165kEnvironment$110kHealth$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $130k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
HELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY$15,000
CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION$10,000
GIRLS INC MORRISTOWN HAMBLE$10,000
UTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$10,000
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANDERA$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DEEP EAST TEX$10,000
PEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIAR$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MORRISTOWN$10,000
THE WORLD OUR PARISH$5,000
NORTH EAST EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 10%UTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 12%HELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY: $15k → 14%NORTH EAST EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%EVERGLADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE WORLD OUR PARISH: $15k → 12%BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 10%UTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 12%HELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY: $10k → 14%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%EVERGLADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE WORLD OUR PARISH: $15k → 12%BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 10%UTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 12%HELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY: $10k → 14%CORAL RESTORATION: $10k → 13%EVERGLADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE WORLD OUR PARISH: $15k → 12%BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 10%UTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 12%HELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY: $10k → 14%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%EVERGLADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE WORLD OUR PARISH: $15k → 12%BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANDERA: $10k → 12%HELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY: $10k → 14%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%EVERGLADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE WORLD OUR PARISH: $15k → 12%BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANDERA: $5k → 12%HELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY: $10k → 14%CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%EVERGLADES FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%THE WORLD OUR PARISH: $5k → 12%PEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIAR: $10k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANDERA: $5k → 12%PEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIAR: $5k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANDERA: $5k → 12%PEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIAR: $5k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANDERA: $5k → 12%PEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIAR: $3k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BANDERA: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$835k · 14 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$835k
$10k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MOSAIC CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • TW
    THE WORLD OUR PARISH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +20%
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
2
Boys & Girls Club of Northeast Tx Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reachtheir full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens throughafter school and summer youth development programs.

Youth Development
3
Boys & Girls Club of Ennis

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys and Girls Club of Brazoria County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
5
Boys and Girls Club of Generational Empowerment

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Health
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of East Alabama

To inspire all young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

—
7
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
8
Boys and Girls Club of Laredo Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

—
9
Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Carolina

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boys & Girls Clubs of Barron County Inc

To enable all young people especially those who need us the most, to reach their dreams and full potential as caring, productive, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Clubs in Texas

To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in texas; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in texas without regard to race,…

Youth Development
12
Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts

Further the purpose of groundwater conservation and protection activities by providing a means of education, communication, and exchange of information between and among individual GCD's and the public regarding the groundwater management…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas; the most unlike its peers is Pedernales Fire Department Auxiliary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $150,000 · OtherBEE CREEK UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRY: $65,000 · OtherHELPING HAND CRISIS MINISTRYGIRLS INC MORRISTOWN HAMBLE: $60,000 · OtherGIRLS INC MORRISTOWN HAMBLEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LUFKIN: $40,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LUFKINUTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $22,500 · OtherUTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC+2 more: $15,000 · OtherTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES…THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL REST…THE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE MOSAIC CE…THE WORLD OUR PARISH INC: $80,000 · InternationalTHE WORLD …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MORRISTOWN INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND G…Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Gir…Texas Children's Hospital: $70,000 · HealthTexas Chi…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BANDERA COUNTY: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsPEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIARY: $22,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$352,500Environment$110,000Human Services$100,000International$80,000Youth Development$80,000Health$70,000Recreation & Sports$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $100,000 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetTHE WORLD OUR PARISH INC: $80,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MORRISTOWN INC: $60,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BANDERA COUNTY: $35,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetUTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $22,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetPEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIARY: $22,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH EAST EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MOSAIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WORLD OUR PARISH INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MORRISTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BANDERA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UTOPIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds PEDERNALES FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIARY ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas ↗
  • Who funds NORTH EAST EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Denman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Denman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Denman’s filings →

More from the funding graph