Skip to content

· Private foundation

Delta Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$423k
Granted FY2026still arriving
27
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$333kEducation$279kPhilanthropy$242kReligion$138kEnvironment$97kHealth$75kRecreation & Sports$40kCommunity Improvement$35kOther$0
02FY2026 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k10 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $362k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Midland Community Foundation$45,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Illinois College$27,000
Michigan Health Foundation$25,000
Individual grant recipient$23,335
Sandcastles Childrens Museum$23,333
Individual grant recipient$23,333
West Shore Community College$23,333
Big Sable Lighthouse Keepers Assoc$23,333
Ludingotn Area Center for the Arts$23,333
First Presbyterian Church$20,000
Epworth Church$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Epworth Church$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–26, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Lakeshore Food Club: $10k → 10%Lakeshore Food Club: $10k → 10%Lakeshore Food Club: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 27 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$10k

Still filing today

26%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Sandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum
    6× · 2021–2026 · $120k · revenue +49%
  • JM
    Jacksonville Main Street
    6× · 2021–2026 · $42k · revenue +47%
  • PU
    Prairieland United Way Inc
    6× · 2021–2026 · $6k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2026 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
3
Saginaw Public Libraries Foundation

Support library activities through materials and services

—
4
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
5
Milwaukee County Historical Society Inc

The milwaukee county historical society was founded in 1935 to collect, preserve, and make available materials relating to the history of the milwaukee community.

Arts & Culture
6
Fund for Lake Michigan Inc

Lake Michigan is one of Wisconsin's greatest assets, and its water is critical to the state's future. The Fund for Lake Michigan is here to help sustain the Lake on behalf of the people and places that depend on it. Our goal is to have a…

Environment
7
Huron County Community Foundation

Receive and Administer funds for the public welfare of the people of Huron County, Michigan

Philanthropy
8
Mothers' Milk Bank of the Western Great Lakes Inc

To provide human milk to improve infant health and save lives.

Health
9
History Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff

Preservation and promotion of community history.

—
10
Saginaw County Convention & Visitors Bureau

Promotion of conventions & tourism in saginaw county

—
11
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
12
Missoula Community Foundation

To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mymichigan Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Main Street. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Midland Community Foundation: $280,000 · OtherMidland Community FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $235,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $120,835 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $120,437 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBig Sable Lighthouse Keepers Assoc: $120,433 · OtherBig Sable Lighthouse Keepers AssocWest Shore Community College: $120,433 · OtherWest Shore Community CollegeLudingotn Area Center for the Arts: $120,429 · OtherLudingotn Area Center for the ArtsEpworth Church: $97,500 · OtherEpworth ChurchFirst Presbyterian Church: $80,000 · Other+13 more: $437,500 · Other+13 moreILLINOIS COLLEGE: $137,000 · EducationSandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum: $120,433 · Arts & CultureMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthJacksonville Main Street: $42,000 · Community ImprovementLAKESHORE FOOD CLUB: $27,000 · Human ServicesSaginaw Community Foundation: $7,000 · PhilanthropyPrairieland United Way Inc: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,732,567Education$137,000Arts & Culture$120,433Health$100,000Community Improvement$42,000Human Services$27,000Philanthropy$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE: $137,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum: $120,433 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJacksonville Main Street: $42,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FARMERS STATE BANK AND TRUST DEPT: $36,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetLAKESHORE FOOD CLUB: $27,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPrairieland United Way Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Sandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum ↗
  • Who funds MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jacksonville Main Street ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FARMERS STATE BANK AND TRUST DEPT ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE FOOD CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Prairieland United Way Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bound To Stay Bound Books FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bound To Stay Bound Books Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Delta Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Delta Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Delta’s filings →

    More from the funding graph