Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Delta Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$390k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Arts & Culture$333kEducation$279kPhilanthropy$242kReligion$138kEnvironment$97kHealth$75kRecreation & Sports$40kCommunity Improvement$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $332k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Midland Community Foundation$45,000
Michigan Health Foundation$25,000
Illinois College$22,000
Big Sable Lighthouse Keepers Assoc$21,667
Individual grant recipient$21,667
Sandcastles Childrens Museum$21,667
West Shore Community College$21,667
Individual grant recipient$21,667
Ludingotn Area Center for the Arts$21,665
First Presbyterian Church$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Lakeshore Food Club$10,000
Epworth Church$10,000
Jacksonville Center for the Arts$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Lakeshore Food Club: $10k → 10%Lakeshore Food Club: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 27 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
0

Total granted

$1.7M
$0

Still filing today

26%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Sandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum
    5× · 2021–2025 · $97k · revenue +49%
  • JM
    Jacksonville Main Street
    5× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +47%
  • PU
    Prairieland United Way Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +9%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Lansing Community Library

    Public library

    Education
    2
    Land Conservancy of West Michigan

    Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

    Environment
    3
    Lakeshore Legal Aid

    Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

    Crime & Legal
    4
    Montgomery County Community Foundation

    The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

    Philanthropy
    5
    Saginaw Public Libraries Foundation

    Support library activities through materials and services

    6
    Legacy Land Conservancy

    Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

    Environment
    7
    Milwaukee County Historical Society Inc

    The milwaukee county historical society was founded in 1935 to collect, preserve, and make available materials relating to the history of the milwaukee community.

    Arts & Culture
    8
    Fund for Lake Michigan Inc

    Lake Michigan is one of Wisconsin's greatest assets, and its water is critical to the state's future. The Fund for Lake Michigan is here to help sustain the Lake on behalf of the people and places that depend on it. Our goal is to have a…

    Environment
    9
    Huron County Community Foundation

    Receive and Administer funds for the public welfare of the people of Huron County, Michigan

    Philanthropy
    10
    Mothers' Milk Bank of the Western Great Lakes Inc

    To provide human milk to improve infant health and save lives.

    Health
    11
    History Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff

    Preservation and promotion of community history.

    12
    Saginaw County Convention & Visitors Bureau

    Promotion of conventions & tourism in saginaw county

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mymichigan Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Main Street. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    4/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Midland Community Foundation — $235,000 · OtherMidland Community FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $190,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $97,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $97,104 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWest Shore Community College — $97,100 · OtherWest Shore Community CollegeBig Sable Lighthouse Keepers Assoc — $97,100 · OtherBig Sable Lighthouse Keepers AssocLudingotn Area Center for the Arts — $97,096 · OtherLudingotn Area Center for the ArtsEpworth Church — $77,500 · OtherEpworth ChurchFirst Presbyterian Church — $60,000 · Other+12 more — $359,500 · Other+12 moreILLINOIS COLLEGE — $110,000 · EducationSandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum — $97,100 · Arts & CultureMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $75,000 · HealthJacksonville Main Street — $35,000 · Community ImprovementLAKESHORE FOOD CLUB — $17,000 · Human ServicesPrairieland United Way Inc — $5,000 · PhilanthropySaginaw Community Foundation — $2,000 · Philanthropy
    Other$1,407,900Education$110,000Arts & Culture$97,100Health$75,000Community Improvement$35,000Human Services$17,000Philanthropy$7,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE — $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum — $97,100 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJacksonville Main Street — $35,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FARMERS STATE BANK AND TRUST DEPT — $30,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetLAKESHORE FOOD CLUB — $17,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPrairieland United Way Inc — $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds ILLINOIS COLLEGE
    • Who funds Sandcastles A Lake Michigan Childrens Museum
    • Who funds MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    • Who funds Jacksonville Main Street
    • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FARMERS STATE BANK AND TRUST DEPT
    • Who funds LAKESHORE FOOD CLUB
    • Who funds Prairieland United Way Inc
    • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Bound To Stay Bound Books FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Bound To Stay Bound Books Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Delta Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph