Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Delta Dental of South Dakota Foundation

To initiate, collaborate and/or support programs that increase access to care, ensure an adequate dental work force and prevent dental disease.

$655k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$2.3MPhilanthropy$1.2MFood & Nutrition$300kEducation$81kHuman Services$25kEmployment$8k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $164,484 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $654,666 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $490,182 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
$17,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SD DENTAL FOUNDATION$76,484
SD DENTAL ASSOCIATION$20,000
HORIZON HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
USD DEPT OF DENTAL HYGIENE$17,000
SD DENTAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION$15,000
WESTERN DAKOTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$8,500
RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CALL TO FREEDOM: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of Delta Dental of South Dakota Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in SD; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Delta Dental of South Dakota Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 11 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$1.7M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+38%

Still filing today

73%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionReligionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $507k · revenue +28%
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $300k · revenue +13%
  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $203k · revenue +16% · 58% of their budget

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1.1M · revenue +45%
  • SH
    SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF THE BLACK HILLSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dakota Dental Foundation

Our mission is to enhance oral health for all individuals. to achieve this goal, we concentrate our efforts on three key areas: 1) access to care, 2) education, and 3) workforce development.

Philanthropy
2
South Dakota State University Foundation

Enhancing excellence by cultivating generosity and treasuring the loyalty of all we serve.

Education
3
Delta Dental of South Dakota

Delta Dental of South Dakota is dedicated to advancing and promoting the improvement of oral health.

4
Sd Association of Healthcare Organizations

Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.

5
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
6
North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy
7
Chicago Dental Society Foundation

Improve oral health by providing funds for dental education and access to care programs

Philanthropy
8
North Dakota Dental Association

Ndda is the leading advocate of oral health promoting education and service to its members and the public.

9
Minnesota Dental Foundation

Minnesota dental foundation's mission is to initiate and support programs that provide dental services to underserved populations and communities; encourage and support volunteerism within the profession; and promote careers in dentistry,…

Education
10
Sacramento District Dental Foundation

To promote the oral and general health of the public by serving as the charitable arm of the sacramento district dental society and the dental community.

11
Delta Dental of Oklahoma Foundation

Improve the oral health of all oklahomans by increasing access to dental care, funding oral health education and supporting organizations who serve vital oral health needs in our communities.

Health
12
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Dakota Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Usd Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $925,000 · PhilanthropySOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUSD FOUNDATION — $251,000 · PhilanthropyUSD FOUNDATIONSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION — $1,100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUND…+1 more — $7,500 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL ASSOCIATION — $507,456 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL ASSOCIA…ST FRANCIS MISSION FOUNDATION — $175,000 · OtherST FRANCIS MISSION FOUNDATI…SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY — $97,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSI…HORIZON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherSIOUX FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT #49-5 — $38,846 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF THE BLACK HILLS — $33,367 · OtherWESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC — $32,546 · Other+2 more — $35,000 · OtherFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $300,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $203,484 · Health+1 more — $6,000 · HealthSt Francis Mission — $50,000 · ReligionSOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL HYGIENISTS ASSN — $40,000 · Community ImprovementCALL TO FREEDOM — $7,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$1,226,000Education$1,107,500Other$959,215Food & Nutrition$300,000Health$209,484Religion$50,000Community Improvement$40,000Human Services$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION — $1,100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $925,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL ASSOCIATION — $507,456 over 8y, 16% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA — $300,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUSD FOUNDATION — $251,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $203,484 over 3y, 58% of budgetSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Mission — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHORIZON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA DENTAL HYGIENISTS ASSN — $40,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF THE BLACK HILLS — $33,367 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC — $32,546 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCITIZENS INVOLVEMENT COUNCIL — $25,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALL TO FREEDOM — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA'S TOOTHFAIRY NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · Oahe Foundation · Black Hills Area Community Foundation · Avera Health · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Sheldon F Reese Foundation · Larson Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Midcontinent Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Delta Dental of South Dakota Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Delta Dental of South Dakota Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Delta Dental of South Dakota Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph