Skip to content
Deloitte Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Deloitte Foundation

The foundation supports various us education initiatives that help the talent of the future, their influencers and promote excellence in teaching, research & curriculum innovation.

$28M
Granted FY2025still arriving
121
Grants FY2025still arriving
28
States reached
$9.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$135MYouth Development$4.5MCommunity Improvement$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.3MHealth$1.2MSocial Science$1.1MPhilanthropy$1.1MEmployment$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 121 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k47 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k44 grants · $4.8M
  • $250k+30 grants · $26M
$50,000
Median grant
28
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$9,038,945
CRISTO REY NETWORK$2,100,000
THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND$1,369,200
THRIVE SCHOLARS$1,000,000
NABA FOUNDATION$765,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA$750,000
BRAVEN INC$750,000
ALPFA INC$750,000
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK ENGINEERS$750,000
HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES$748,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION$689,431
STRIVE FOR COLLEGE COLLABORATIVE (USTRIVE)$625,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$530,925
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$527,433
GIRLS WHO CODE$500,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $100k → 17%GIRLS INC OF SAN ANTONIO: $50k → 16%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 24%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $100k → 17%THE CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK: $45k → 9%CHILDREN NOW: $100k → 10%HARLEM YMCA (YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK): $25k → 17%CHILDREN NOW: $35k → 10%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $40k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON: $25k → 16%YMCA METROPOLITAN ATLANTA: $50k → 13%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $500k → 17%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ATLANTA: $50k → 13%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ATLANTA: $50k → 13%GIRLS WHO CODE: $500k → 17%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ATLANTA INC: $40k → 13%HARLEM YMCA: $34k → 17%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ATLANTA: $25k → 13%COLLEGE BOUND DORCHESTER DBA BOSTON UNCORNERED: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Deloitte Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Deloitte Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117M · 397 repeat orgs$6.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

397 repeat relationships: 93 still active in FY2025, 304 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

397
163

Total granted

$117M
$5.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+14%

Still filing today

92%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CRISTO REY NETWORK
    5× · 2021–2025 · $7.7M · revenue +75%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $4.6M · revenue +127%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • RF
    Research Foundation of the City University of New York
    one grant, 2023 · $499k · revenue +11%
  • TN
    THE NORTH CAROLINA A&T INVESTMENT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $291k
  • TU
    THE URBAN ASSEMBLY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $285k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
11
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacred Heart University Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is One Hundred Black Men of South Florida Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

565 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 565 of the 607 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
558/565
Grantees still filing
398/565
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISTO REY NETWORK: $7,728,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NETWORKUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $4,567,511 · EducationSTRIVE FOR COLLEGE INC: $4,354,000 · Education+130 more: $69,272,994 · Education+130 moreBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $2,350,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Si…ALPFA INC: $2,300,000 · OtherALPFA INCUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $2,124,465 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH…PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,578,492 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE …NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC: $1,365,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATIO…Carnegie Mellon University: $1,341,790 · OtherCarnegie Mellon Uni…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1,085,704 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,081,062 · OtherAmerican Accounting Association: $954,574 · Other+38 more: $8,745,466 · Other+38 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $16,599,817 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID …+3 more: $1,076,748 · Philanthropy+3 moreBRAVEN INC: $2,275,000 · Youth DevelopmentStem Advantage: $265,000 · Youth DevelopmentYoung Black Leadership Alliance: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentDIY GIRLS: $105,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $300,000 · Youth DevelopmentNational Society of Black Engineers: $2,250,000 · Science & TechSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $1,540,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC: $175,000 · Community ImprovementNEW JERSEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Community ImprovementSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $135,000 · Community ImprovementGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $259,000 · Human ServicesCommunities in Schools of Atlanta Inc: $165,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOW: $135,000 · Human Services
Education$85,922,505Other$22,926,553Philanthropy$17,676,565Youth Development$3,095,000Science & Tech$2,250,000Community Improvement$2,000,000Human Services$1,559,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $16,599,817 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK: $7,728,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $4,567,511 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSTRIVE FOR COLLEGE INC: $4,354,000 over 8y, 33% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America: $2,350,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $2,339,400 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBRAVEN INC: $2,275,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNational Society of Black Engineers: $2,250,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetHISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES: $2,244,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $2,209,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $2,070,260 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS: $2,000,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $1,990,538 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNABA FOUNDATION INC: $1,865,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $1,861,770 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,801,054 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $1,775,082 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $1,710,697 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $1,640,781 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,581,266 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $1,540,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $1,522,541 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $1,480,135 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,377,558 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC: $1,365,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $1,341,790 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,281,847 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,267,972 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $1,246,882 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,073,276 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetJackson State University Development Foundation Inc: $998,072 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $990,944 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $968,545 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Accounting Association: $954,574 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $935,213 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Innovations in Education: $891,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetHAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $825,355 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation: $803,199 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $773,548 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $694,373 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $674,236 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMarquette University: $662,307 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetStillman College: $660,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $652,914 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $639,264 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $636,416 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $615,868 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STRIVE FOR COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds ALPFA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds National Society of Black Engineers ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NABA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds Jackson State University Development Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Accounting Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ernst & Young Foundat…Kpmg US Foundation IncPwc Foundation IncIbm International Fou…Council of Independen…National Collegiate A…Charles Koch Foundati…Fidelity FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…National Basketball A…Rsm US FoundationThe Northrop Grumman …
Ernst & Young FoundationNY79.7× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ernst & Young Foundation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Charles Koch Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Basketball Association Foundation · Rsm US Foundation · The Northrop Grumman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Deloitte Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Deloitte Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: 21% of income from government
  • Delaware State University: 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • The Morgan State University Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Bentley University: 1% of income from government
  • Assumption University: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 607 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deloitte’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home