Skip to content

· Private foundation

DeLeone Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$110kHousing & Shelter$87kYouth Development$78kReligion$59kHealth$36kFood & Nutrition$14kCrime & Legal$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$725k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Deschutes Children's Foundation$16,000
Opportunity Center of Central OR$15,000
Bethlehem Inn$11,500
St Thomas Catholic Church$1,600
Faith Hope Charity Vineyards$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $16k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $4k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $3k → 10%Saving Grace: $2k → 10%Deschutes Children's Foundation: $16k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$369k · 17 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$369k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+19%

Still filing today

41%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +11%
  • BI
    BETHLEHEM INN
    2× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +12%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND
    4× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • OC
    OPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGON
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OREG
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TG
    THE GIVING PLATE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gleaners of Clackamas County Inc

Provide food to low income families.

—
2
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—
3
Lake County Food Share Inc

Lake county food share inc is an organization whose purpose is to coordinate and to meet both supplemental and emergency food needs of families and individuals in lake county, oregon.

Food & Nutrition
4
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
5
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
6
Every Child Central Oregon

Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.

Human Services
7
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
8
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
10
Abc House Inc

Provide assessment, treatment, and prevention services to children believed to be abused throughout linn and benton counties, oregon.

Human Services
11
Assistance League of Corvallis Inc

Assistance league aims to provide the essential needs to the families in our community to allow them to flourish. these essential needs are provided through six programs; operation school bell, hygiene help, dental education, hug-a-bear,…

Health
12
Oregon Abuse Advocates and Survivors in Service

Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Bend; the most unlike its peers is The 1017 Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Shepard's House: $47,000 · OtherShepard's HouseST VINCENT DE PAUL REDMOND: $35,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL REDMONDST VINCENT DE PAUL CROOK COUNTY: $35,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL CROOK COUNTYSISTERS OF MARY KAKAMEGA: $33,100 · OtherSISTERS OF MARY KAKAMEGAOpportunity Center of Central OR: $25,000 · OtherOpportunity Center of Central OROPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGO: $20,000 · OtherOPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGOST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $19,100 · OtherST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCHASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND: $17,500 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BENDOPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGON: $10,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL: $9,500 · Other+8 more: $28,190 · Other+8 moreDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $46,750 · Human ServicesDESCHUTES CHILD…SAVING GRACE: $8,500 · Human ServicesSAVING GRACEBETHLEHEM INN: $31,981 · Housing & ShelterBETHLEHEM…THE 1017 PROJECT: $8,500 · Food & NutritionTHE GIVING PLATE: $5,000 · Food & NutritionKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $10,500 · Crime & LegalSPARROW CLUBS USA: $6,000 · Religion
Other$279,390Human Services$55,250Housing & Shelter$31,981Food & Nutrition$13,500Crime & Legal$10,500Religion$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $46,750 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $31,981 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND: $17,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 1017 PROJECT: $8,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSAVING GRACE: $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPARROW CLUBS USA: $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GIVING PLATE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND ↗
  • Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE 1017 PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
  • Who funds SPARROW CLUBS USA ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Anjulicia Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Bend Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Janet and Earl Seekins Family Foundation · Michael J & Adele M Tennant Charitable · Willard L & Ruth P Eccles Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization DeLeone Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DeLeone Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 48%
  • Saving Grace: 48% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on DeLeone’s filings →

More from the funding graph