Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

DeLeone Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$110kHousing & Shelter$87kYouth Development$78kReligion$59kHealth$36kFood & Nutrition$14kCrime & Legal$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$725k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Deschutes Children's Foundation$16,000
Opportunity Center of Central OR$15,000
Bethlehem Inn$11,500
St Thomas Catholic Church$1,600
Faith Hope Charity Vineyards$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $16k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $4k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $3k → 10%Saving Grace: $2k → 10%Deschutes Children's Foundation: $16k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$369k · 17 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$369k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+19%

Still filing today

41%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterReligionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +11%
  • BI
    BETHLEHEM INN
    2× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +12%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND
    4× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • OC
    OPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGON
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OREG
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TG
    THE GIVING PLATE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gleaners of Clackamas County Inc

Provide food to low income families.

2
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

3
Lake County Food Share Inc

Lake county food share inc is an organization whose purpose is to coordinate and to meet both supplemental and emergency food needs of families and individuals in lake county, oregon.

Food & Nutrition
4
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

5
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
6
Every Child Central Oregon

Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.

Human Services
7
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
8
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
10
Abc House Inc

Provide assessment, treatment, and prevention services to children believed to be abused throughout linn and benton counties, oregon.

Human Services
11
Assistance League of Corvallis Inc

Assistance league aims to provide the essential needs to the families in our community to allow them to flourish. these essential needs are provided through six programs; operation school bell, hygiene help, dental education, hug-a-bear,…

Health
12
Oregon Abuse Advocates and Survivors in Service

Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Bend and the most unlike its peers is The 1017 Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Shepard's House — $47,000 · OtherShepard's HouseST VINCENT DE PAUL REDMOND — $35,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL REDMONDST VINCENT DE PAUL CROOK COUNTY — $35,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL CROOK COUNTYSISTERS OF MARY KAKAMEGA — $33,100 · OtherSISTERS OF MARY KAKAMEGAOpportunity Center of Central OR — $25,000 · OtherOpportunity Center of Central OROPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGO — $20,000 · OtherOPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGOST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCH — $19,100 · OtherST THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCHASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND — $17,500 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BENDOPPORTUNITY CENTER OF CENTRAL OREGON — $10,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL — $9,500 · Other+8 more — $28,190 · Other+8 moreDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $46,750 · Human ServicesDESCHUTES CHILD…SAVING GRACE — $8,500 · Human ServicesSAVING GRACEBETHLEHEM INN — $31,981 · Housing & ShelterBETHLEHEM…THE 1017 PROJECT — $8,500 · Food & NutritionTHE GIVING PLATE — $5,000 · Food & NutritionKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $10,500 · Crime & LegalSPARROW CLUBS USA — $6,000 · Religion
Other$279,390Human Services$55,250Housing & Shelter$31,981Food & Nutrition$13,500Crime & Legal$10,500Religion$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $46,750 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN — $31,981 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND — $17,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 1017 PROJECT — $8,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSAVING GRACE — $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPARROW CLUBS USA — $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GIVING PLATE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND
  • Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER
  • Who funds THE 1017 PROJECT
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE
  • Who funds SPARROW CLUBS USA
  • Who funds THE GIVING PLATE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Anjulicia Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Bend Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Janet and Earl Seekins Family Foundation · Michael J & Adele M Tennant Charitable · Willard L & Ruth P Eccles Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization DeLeone Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 48%
  • Saving Grace48% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph