Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Delaware State University

DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world.

$43M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$480k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$21M
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $1,288,888 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $43,416,396 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,127,508 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $277k
  • $250k+2 grants · $869k
$33,649
Median grant
9
States reached
$530M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$479,778
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY$388,990
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$165,930
POTOMAC COLLEGE LLC DBA UNIVERSITY OF THE POTOMAC$111,431
WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORP$41,636
DELAWARE TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE$33,649
LINCOLN UNIVERSITY$24,803
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$11,286
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$9,035
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$7,350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 17% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1.9M → 10%DELAWARE TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $34k → 10%DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $7.5M → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $208k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $101k → 12%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE DBA TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $134k → 16%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $91k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUF: $103k → 22%POTOMAC COLLEGE LLC DBA UNIVERSITY OF THE POTOMAC: $111k → 14%WEST MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $74k → 12%ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $42k → 18%WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORP: $42k → 18%MAYVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 19%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $166k → 14%MAYVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $41k → 9%VIRGINIA POLYTECH INST: $41k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHORE: $72k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1.5M → 10%DELAWARE TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $34k → 10%DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $86k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $159k → 8%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $72k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUFF: $102k → 22%POTOMAC COLLEGE LLC DBA UNIVERSITY OF THE POTOMAC: $50k → 14%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $40k → 18%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $441k → 14%LOUISIAN STATE UNIVERSITY A&M COLLEGE: $45k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1.0M → 10%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $742k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $148k → 8%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $436k → 14%STATE OF MARYLAND: $81k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $900k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $546k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $90k → 8%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $71k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $281k → 14%ST OF MARYLAND: $62k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $376k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $400k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $61k → 8%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $116k → 14%STATE OF MARYLAND: $57k → 11%STATE OF MARYLAND: $55k → 11%ST OF MARYLAND: $54k → 11%WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY: $389k → 10%WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY: $275k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $480k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ND
IL
WI
MI
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 24 repeat orgs$510k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
15

Total granted

$20M
$426k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+12%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +37%
  • Northwestern University
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +41%
  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    one grant, 2024 · $134k · revenue +12%
  • VP
    VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $41k
  • SO
    STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2023 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Delaware State University

Delaware state university is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world. (continued on schedule o.)building on its heritage as a…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
6
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Delaware and the most unlike its peers is Bexar County Master Gardeners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $7,890,154 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $767,175 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS+28 more — $1,860,035 · Other+28 moreDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,585,602 · EducationDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCWILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC — $663,649 · EducationWILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC+10 more — $472,301 · Education+10 moreNorthwestern University — $1,265,250 · Recreation & SportsBEXAR COUNTY MASTER GARDENERS — $7,350 · Environment
Other$10,517,364Education$8,721,552Recreation & Sports$1,265,250Environment$7,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $7,890,154 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,585,602 over 2y, 44% of budgetNorthwestern University — $1,265,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC — $663,649 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $133,717 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $91,414 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY — $80,103 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE AEROSPACE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $45,835 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $41,636 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTuskegee University — $33,485 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLAFLIN UNIVERSITY — $29,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $24,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE — $13,826 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $11,286 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $9,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
  • Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LINCOLN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DELAWARE AEROSPACE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds Tuskegee University
  • Who funds CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · 1890 Universities Foundation · Thurgood Marshall College Fund · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Chemical Society · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Tuskegee University · Executive Leadership Council · National 4-H Council · Columbus Foundation · Student Freedom Initiative Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Delaware State University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Delaware Aerospace Education Foundation62% of income from government
  • University of Delaware30% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Wilmington University Inc1% of income from government
  • Springfield College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph