Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dejaco Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$182kEducation$86kHuman Services$59kHealth$58kInternational$55kFood & Nutrition$50kHousing & Shelter$32kCrime & Legal$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$3,750
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC CHURCH$11,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
ST BRIGID OF KILDARE$7,500
ST BRENDAN CHURCH$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
GOOD WORKS INC ATHENS OH$5,000
ST JUDE$5,000
DC VOLUNTEER LAWYERS$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
LA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
CROSS INTERNATIONAL$5,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$4,000
BISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL$4,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$3,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $3k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $2k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $2k → 16%PREGNANCY CENTER EAST: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
WI
NY
OH
PA
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$404k · 36 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
47

Total granted

$404k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+10%

Still filing today

36%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationReligionFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +5%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • VL
    VOLUNTEER LEGAL ADVOCATES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CINCINNATI ORATORY OF ST PHILIP
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • CO
    CINCINNATI ORATORY OF ST PHILIP NER
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
2
The Women's Clinic of Columbus

Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.

Health
3
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
5
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
6
Women's Foodservice Forum

Accelerate the advancement of women leaders in the food industry. we believe in limitless opportunity for all women.

Food & Nutrition
7
Milkworks Inc

Creating a healthier community by empowering families to reach their breastfeeding goals.

Health
8
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
9
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
11
Food Connect Co

At food connect, we're dedicated to bridging the gaps in our food system, working to end hunger and fostering healthier communities through our innovative initiatives and programs. we build scalable technologies that support last-mile…

Food & Nutrition
12
Women's Care Center Inc

Offer life-affirming choices for pregnancy and sexual health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Water Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST BRIGID OF KILDARE: $32,550 · OtherST BRIGID OF KILDAREMid-Ohio Foodbank: $25,000 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $22,070 · OtherST JUDE: $18,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $18,000 · OtherOLD ST MARY CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherGOOD WORKS INC ATHENS OH: $15,000 · OtherBISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL: $15,000 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,750 · Other+68 more: $240,113 · Other+68 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $17,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR T…THE WATER PROJECT INC: $7,500 · InternationalTHE WATER …CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,819 · InternationalThe Daughters of Saint Eliae Inc: $22,000 · ReligionCross International Inc: $8,558 · ReligionVOLUNTEER LEGAL ADVOCATES: $23,000 · Housing & ShelterUniversity of Dayton: $6,500 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationPELOTONIA: $1,114 · EducationLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $7,000 · Food & NutritionWILDWOOD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$432,483International$51,319Religion$30,558Housing & Shelter$23,000Education$12,614Food & Nutrition$9,500Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER LEGAL ADVOCATES: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Daughters of Saint Eliae Inc: $22,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCross International Inc: $8,558 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDWOOD SOUP KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $1,819 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $1,114 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNumFOCUS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER LEGAL ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds The Daughters of Saint Eliae Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Cross International Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WATER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dejaco Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dejaco Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dejaco’s filings →

More from the funding graph