Skip to content

· Private foundation

Declaration of Trust of the Joseph and Mary Cacioppo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$335k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MPhilanthropy$279kAnimals$151kHuman Services$52kArts & Culture$50kHealth$49kYouth Development$38kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $238k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$125,000
COLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDS$113,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$45,044
PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
WRIGHT FLIGHT$12,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SO AZ$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $60k → 15%SENTINELS OF FREEDOM: $48k → 9%CAGSP RESCUE: $14k → 11%THE LEAVES INC: $15k → 14%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $75k → 14%JAPHET SCHOOL INC: $60k → 8%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $197k → 14%LYNN HOUSE PATOMAC VALLEY: $36k → 9%COLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $113k → 26%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $55k → 15%SENTINELS OF FREEDOM: $20k → 9%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $66k → 14%JAPHET SCHOOL INC: $55k → 8%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $150k → 14%LYNN HOUSE PATOMAC VALLEY: $20k → 9%COLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $80k → 26%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $50k → 15%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $25k → 14%JAPHET SCHOOL INC: $50k → 8%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $136k → 14%COLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $70k → 26%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $45k → 15%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $20k → 14%JAPHET SCHOOL INC: $50k → 8%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $133k → 14%COLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $50k → 26%STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP'S: $28k → 15%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $20k → 14%JAPHET SCHOOL INC: $40k → 8%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $125k → 14%COLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $50k → 26%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $21k → 15%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $20k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $117k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $15k → 15%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $20k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $105k → 14%PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $12k → 14%STUDY ABROAD ARIZONA IN ITALY: $17k → 15%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $20k → 15%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $20k → 15%DOMINICAN AMERICAN NATIONAL: $12k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $20k → 15%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $15k → 15%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $15k → 15%BIG BROTHER'S BIG SISTER'S OF SOUTH: $20k → 15%WRIGHT FLIGHT: $17k → 15%WRIGHT FLIGHT: $13k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
CA
KY
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 10 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$1.4M
$273k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+25%

Still filing today

70%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsPhilanthropyReligionHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $279k · revenue +42%
  • University of Arizona Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $193k · revenue +54%
  • HS
    Humane Society of Southern Arizona
    3× · 2021–2023 · $90k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2017 · $65k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $28k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PIMA COUNTY CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
2
Liberty Wildlife Inc

Liberty Wildlife nurtures the nature of Arizona by providing quality wildlife rehabilitation, environmental education and conservation consultation services for the community.

—
3
Fearless Kitty Rescue

As a no-kill cat rescue, serving our community of Fountain Hills, AZ and surrounding areas, we are dedicated to rescuing cats and kittens left homeless for whatever reason and placing them in a loving, responsible, permanent home.

Animals
4
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
5
Valley Christian Schools

The mission of valley christian schools is to equip students to be culture changers for christ by delivering academic excellence, facilitating spiritual growth, and building lifelong community.

Education
6
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
7
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
8
The Academy of Tucson

To provide a quality education for students characterized by: a sound college preparatory curriculum; a faculty of educated, respected, encouraging and caring teachers; a safe and supportive environment for learning.

Education
9
The Paideia Academies Inc

To utilize a family centric model to enlist the support of families in the education and upbringing of the whole child- academic & intellectual, recreational & cultural, character & leadership, emotional, physical & mental health- to…

Education
10
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
11
Disability Rights Arizona

DRAZ is a non-profit law firm that assists Arizonans with disabilities to promote and protect their legal rights to independence, justice, and equality.

Civil Rights
12
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wright Flight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $962,538 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEJAPHET SCHOOL INC: $255,000 · EducationJAPHET SCHOOL INCUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $193,429 · EducationUniversity of Arizona FoundationSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation: $67,500 · Education+2 more: $55,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $363,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF THE CUMBERLANDSUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $65,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONALYNN HOUSE PATOMAC VALLEY: $56,000 · OtherLYNN HOUSE PATOMAC VALLEYIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF PIMA COUNTY CARE CENTER: $25,000 · Other+9 more: $101,152 · Other+9 moreTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $279,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILANTH…Humane Society of Southern Arizona: $90,000 · AnimalsTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $24,474 · AnimalsFriends of Pima Animal Care Center: $18,000 · AnimalsThe Leaves Inc: $20,000 · ReligionTIME OUT INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterArizona Crisis Team Inc: $5,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$1,533,967Other$638,152Philanthropy$279,000Animals$132,474Religion$20,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $962,538 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $279,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetJAPHET SCHOOL INC: $255,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $193,429 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona: $90,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation: $67,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWRIGHT FLIGHT INC: $35,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTucson Wildlife Center Inc: $24,474 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Leaves Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center: $18,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTIME OUT INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds JAPHET SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
  • Who funds Sentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WRIGHT FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Leaves Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Pima Animal Care Center ↗
  • Who funds TIME OUT INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Crisis Team Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Declaration of Trust of the Joseph and Mary Cacioppo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Declaration of Trust of the Joseph and Mary Cacioppo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Declaration of Trust of the Joseph and Mary Cacioppo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Declaration of Trust of the Joseph and Mary Cacioppo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Declaration of Trust of the Joseph and Mary Cacioppo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph