Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dechambeau Creek Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$77kCommunity Improvement$69kEducation$53kArts & Culture$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kRecreation & Sports$23kPhilanthropy$12kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPA$11,500
SIERRA STEM$11,000
OIKONOS$10,000
LEE VINING WOMEN'S LEAGUE$9,500
JUNE LAKE LITTLE LOOPERS$9,500
MONO ARTS COUNCIL$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,025
MONO BASIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE INYO$5,000
EASTERN SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSING$4,000
MONO LAKE COMMITTEE$3,000
LEE VINING FIRE PROTECTION DIST$2,700
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
MONO CITY FIRE PROTECTION DIST$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%RIALY FLORES: $5k → 7%IMACA: $14k → 10%DEATH VALLEY NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCI: $6k → 11%OIKONOS: $10k → 9%TROUT UNLIMITED: $5k → 7%SIERRA STEM: $11k → 10%OIKONOS: $10k → 9%EASTERN SIERRA INTERPRETIVE ASSOCIA: $10k → 10%OIKONOS: $9k → 9%JUNE LAKE LITTLE LOOPERS: $10k → 10%OIKONOS: $6k → 9%FRIENDS OF INYO: $6k → 10%OIKONOS: $6k → 9%SIERRA STEM: $5k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE INYO: $5k → 10%JUNE LAKE LITTLE LOOPERS: $4k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE INYO: $5k → 10%CHARLES PEAKE: $3k → 10%WILD IRIS: $5k → 10%MONO ARTS COUNCIL: $8k → 10%MONO ARTS COUNCIL: $7k → 10%MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION: $5k → 10%MAMMOTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%EASTERN SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSING: $4k → 10%EASTERN SIERRA COMMUNITY HOUSING: $3k → 10%MAMMOTH LAKES HOUSING: $3k → 10%MONO ARTS COUNCIL: $3k → 10%MONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPA: $15k → 10%MONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPA: $13k → 10%MONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPA: $12k → 10%MONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPA: $12k → 10%LEE VINING WOMEN'S LEAGUE: $10k → 10%MONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPA: $8k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN FUND OF THE COMM PRES: $7k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN FUND OF THE COMM PRES: $7k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN FUND OF THE COMM PRES: $7k → 10%FRIENDS OF LEE VINING LIBRARY: $5k → 10%MONO BASIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 10%MONO BASIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 10%LEE VINING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $5k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN FUND OF THE COMM PRES: $5k → 10%LEE VINING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $4k → 10%MONO CITY FIRE PROTECTION DIST: $3k → 10%MONO LAKE COMMITTEE: $3k → 10%LEE VINING FIRE PROTECTION DIST: $3k → 10%LEE VINING FIRE PROTECTION DIST: $3k → 10%MONO CITY FIRE PROTECTION DIST: $3k → 10%DIEGO MUIRRA: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$245k · 15 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$245k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+60%

Still filing today

47%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentScience & TechEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OE
    OIKONOS - ECOSYSTEM KNOWLEDGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $41k · revenue +15%
  • MA
    MONO ARTS COUNCIL
    4× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +57%
  • ES
    Eastern Sierra Community Housing
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • I
    IMACA
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • TW
    THE WILDERNESS LAND TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • ES
    EASTERN SIERRA INTERPRETIVE ASSOCIA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Intertribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council
—
2
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
3
Mltpa Foundation

To plan, steward, interpret, promote, and sustain a system of four-season trails and public access to natural areas in the Mammoth Lakes and Eastern Sierra Nevada region in the state of California while protecting its natural resources.

Environment
4
Mono Lake Kutzadika Indian Community Cultural Preserv Associa

Provide stewardship conservation of lands agency education and committee membership. Tribal networking within California and Nevada throughout the Great Basin on land and cultural history of the area. Provide education and education…

Arts & Culture
5
Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc

CSERC protects water, wildlife, and wild places of the Northern Yosemite region.

Unclassified
6
Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance

At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.

—
7
North Fork Mono Tribe

Rebuild tribal lands located in the cental sierra nevada mountains of california and raise awareness of the effect of the native american on the environment

Arts & Culture
8
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
9
Mendocino Land Trust

To conserve and restore valuable natural resources of Mendocino County Region. Dedicated to providing public access to the coast & protecting working farmlands, forests, wildlife habitat, open space, scenic vistas & watersheds.

Environment
10
Tahoe Institute for Natural Science

To advance the natural history, conservation and ecosystem knowledge of the Tahoe region through science, education and outreach.

Environment
11
CalWild

The California Wilderness Coalition protects the natural landscapes that make California unique, providing clean air and water, a home to wildlife, and a place for recreation and spiritual renewal.

—
12
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mammoth Lakes Recreation; the most unlike its peers is Trout Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPA: $59,340 · OtherMONO LAKE KUTZADIKA'A CPAPRESBYTERIAN FUND OF THE COMM PRES: $25,961 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN FUND OF THE COMM PRESMONO ARTS COUNCIL: $18,000 · OtherMONO ARTS COUNCILIMACA: $13,500 · OtherIMACAJUNE LAKE LITTLE LOOPERS: $13,000 · OtherJUNE LAKE LITTLE LOOPERSLEE VINING FIRE PROTECTION DIST: $10,700 · OtherMONO CITY FIRE PROTECTION DIST: $10,500 · OtherEASTERN SIERRA INTERPRETIVE ASSOCIA: $10,000 · OtherLEE VINING WOMEN S LEAGUE INC: $9,500 · OtherLEE VINING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $8,700 · Other+18 more: $45,573 · Other+18 moreOIKONOS - ECOSYSTEM KNOWLEDGE: $41,000 · Science & TechOIKONOS - ECO…THE WILDERNESS LAND TRUST: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDER…Friends of the Inyo: $10,000 · EnvironmentFriends of…Death Valley Natural History Association: $6,000 · EnvironmentDeath Vall…MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentMAMMOTH LA…SIERRA STEM: $16,000 · EducationEastern Sierra Community Housing: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterMONO BASIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMAMMOTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $4,500 · PhilanthropyTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 · Animals
Other$224,774Science & Tech$41,000Environment$31,000Education$16,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$9,500Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOIKONOS - ECOSYSTEM KNOWLEDGE: $41,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMONO ARTS COUNCIL: $18,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetSIERRA STEM: $16,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEastern Sierra Community Housing: $10,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of the Inyo: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMONO BASIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetDeath Valley Natural History Association: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMAMMOTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OIKONOS - ECOSYSTEM KNOWLEDGE ↗
  • Who funds MONO ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA STEM ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Sierra Community Housing ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Inyo ↗
  • Who funds MONO BASIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Death Valley Natural History Association ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION ↗
  • Who funds MAMMOTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lorber FoundationMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lorber Foundation · The Mono Lake Foundation · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dechambeau Creek Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dechambeau Creek Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dechambeau Creek Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dechambeau Creek Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dechambeau Creek’s filings →

    More from the funding graph