How much did DEBRA AND DANIEL OCHSTEIN FAMILY grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$185kArts & Culture$103kCivil Rights$80kInternational$41kHealth$31kHuman Services$17kEducation$15kYouth Development$15kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$239k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2023

jewish

2024

temple bethbeth petersburgchabad lubavitchlubavitch southsouth tampaparenthood southwest

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k14 grants · $68k
$10k–50k9 grants · $130k
$50k–250k2 grants · $100k

$8,000

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC$50,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTH TAMPA$50,000
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTH TAMPA$30,000
PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC$15,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUN$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SW AND CENTRAL FLORIDA$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$10,000
AUTISM INSPIRED INC$10,000
ST PETERSBURG FREE CLINIC INC$10,000
FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITIO$10,000
MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE$8,000
ABORTION FUND OF OHIO$8,000
THE ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$8,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$234k · 7 repeat orgs$505k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$234k

$310k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%

+65%

Still filing today

100%

72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CW
COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +5%
FR
FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $65k · revenue +5%
THE ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +102%

Funded once

JF
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATIgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $185k · revenue +65%
PC
PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC
one grant, 2023 · $21k
AC
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +255%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc

Feeding Northeast Florida works to permanently end hunger in Northeast Florida by providing nutritious foods and other essential goods to people facing hunger, by addressing food insecurity, poverty and poor health through education and…

Food & Nutrition

San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin county.

—

American Civil Liberties Union of

To promote civil liberties through communication and interaction with and between the citizens and legislators of the state of florida

Civil Rights

Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc

Together, we nourish our neighbors and improve their lives one meal at a time.

Food & Nutrition

Orlando Center for Justice

Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.s mission is to bridge the access to justice gap in Florida for newcomers by helping these underserved communities navigate the legal system through education and innovation.

Crime & Legal

The Harvey Milk Foundation Florida Corp

Philanthropy

The Womens Care Florida Foundation

—

Florida Animal Protection Foundation

Animals

The Houston Food Bank

The mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided 123 million nutritious meals in 18 counties through our 1,600 community partners.

—

Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment

Opportunities for All Floridians Inc

Opportunity For All Floridians advocates for hardworking Floridians by championing economic policies that put people over profits ensuring that everyday residents benefit more than large corporations and special interests. We are committed…

Civil Rights

Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc

JFCS, guided by Jewish values, works with youth and other vulnerable community members of all faiths to build resilience and to achieve the social and economic stability needed to support their mental health and well-being.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is World Central Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/29

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/26

Grantees still filing

24/26

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$282,000Philanthropy$185,000Arts & Culture$103,000Civil Rights$80,000International$41,000Health$30,500Human Services$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Tides Foundation · Charles & Margery Barancik Foundation Inc · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DEBRA AND DANIEL OCHSTEIN FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 825519212 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family?

Find your warmest path to Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DEBRA AND DANIEL OCHSTEIN FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family?

More from the funding graph

DEBRA AND DANIEL OCHSTEIN FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Debra and Daniel Ochstein Family?

More from the funding graph