· Private foundation
De Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $3,300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,200 |
| Peshy Brudny Fund | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,800 |
| Sorala Fund | $1,500 |
| Congragation Bnei Yitzchak | $1,500 |
| Chesed Fund | $1,300 |
| Rivka Laufer Bikur Cholim | $1,200 |
| Kollel Zichron Menachem of Jerusale | $1,200 |
| Hatzoloh | $1,000 |
| Bubbies Place | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Telshe Yeshiva | $500 |
| Cong Kolel B | $180 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PBPeshy Brudny Fund3× · 2023–2025 · $9k
- YOYESHIVA OF KASHO2× · 2023–2024 · $6k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
Funded once
- SRSHUVU RETURN INCone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +10%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $4k
- OOHELone grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide religious Jewish education.
To stimulate, create and promote a comprehensive, meaningful and fulfilling appreciation, awareness and identification with judaic cultural, historic, and civilizational values. chabad of se morris county provides a safe haven where people…
To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.
Provides day care in the heart of tel-aviv. provides afternoon activities for young children and youth. there are evening classes for adults covering a variety of subjects.
Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Support religious jewish instituions in furthering torah study
Educational-operation of private girls' high school
Assistance to the indigent
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Jsw Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Ezra Charitable Trust · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization De Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from De Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on De’s filings →