· Private foundation
De Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $3,300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,200 |
| Peshy Brudny Fund | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,800 |
| Sorala Fund | $1,500 |
| Congragation Bnei Yitzchak | $1,500 |
| Chesed Fund | $1,300 |
| Rivka Laufer Bikur Cholim | $1,200 |
| Kollel Zichron Menachem of Jerusale | $1,200 |
| Hatzoloh | $1,000 |
| Bubbies Place | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Telshe Yeshiva | $500 |
| Cong Kolel B | $180 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPeshy Brudny Fund3× · 2023–2025 · $9k
- YOYESHIVA OF KASHO2× · 2023–2024 · $6k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
Funded once
- SRSHUVU RETURN INCone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +10%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $4k
- OOHELone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide religious Jewish education.
To stimulate, create and promote a comprehensive, meaningful and fulfilling appreciation, awareness and identification with judaic cultural, historic, and civilizational values. chabad of se morris county provides a safe haven where people…
To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.
Provides day care in the heart of tel-aviv. provides afternoon activities for young children and youth. there are evening classes for adults covering a variety of subjects.
Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Support religious jewish instituions in furthering torah study
Educational-operation of private girls' high school
Assistance to the indigent
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshiva Dmir Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rivkah Laufer Bikur Cholim. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Jsw Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Ezra Charitable Trust · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization De Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bais Tova Inc — 7% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.